Purpose
To help strengthen arts organizations that bring ongoing arts experiences and services to individuals, communities, and other organizations throughout the state.
Who's Eligible
S.C. nonprofit organizations and units of government, who either have a primary mission focused on the arts, serve as the primary arts provider in their community, or provide ongoing arts programming in their community.
Funding
No pre-set range
Matching Requirement
3:1 (grantee:SCAC)
Current General Operating Support (GOS) grantees have been split into three groups, to reapply once every three years. If you are a current GOS grantee and do not know your Group number, please contact the Grants Team (803.734.8695 | grants@arts.sc.gov).
These guidelines are for use by eligible applicants for FY25 funding.
FY24 grantees in GOS Group 3 may apply for a new funding cycle using the application available November 16, 2023. FY24 grantees in GOS Groups 1 and 2 will continue their existing funding cycle in FY25. An FY25 grant contract will be issued upon approval of the grantee’s FY24 final report, due in August 2024.
Please Note
Grant guidelines are subject to change until application opens.
To help strengthen arts organizations that bring ongoing arts experiences and services to individuals, communities, and other organizations throughout the state via three (3) years of support for basic operations for applicants ranging from emerging to established arts organizations with primary missions involving these artistic functions:
To be eligible for this grant, an organization must fit all the following criteria.
In accordance with federal government policy, all organizations – including (but not limited to) private schools, public school districts, government entities, and nonprofit organizations – must provide a valid UEI number* to receive an SCAC grant award.
*Learn about the Unique Entity ID (UEI)
Note: If an applicant organization is using a fiscal agent/receiver, separate UEI numbers must be provided for both the applicant organization and the fiscal agent/receiver. Exceptions to separate UEI numbers are organizations run by a local government or a school district.
Note for new applicants: Eligible organizations with an arts expense budget of $75,000 or less may apply for either an OSS grant OR a General Operating Support (GOS) Grant.
What’s the difference between a General Operating Support (GOS) Grant and an Operating Support for Small Organizations (OSS) Grant?
OSS Grants are specifically designed for small arts organizations, with expense budgets of $75,000 or less. If your budget meets these criteria, you may apply in either operating support category (GOS or OSS), but not both.
The main differences between OSS and GOS are:
Grantees may use these funds for any general operating expense related to their arts programming, such as staff salaries, paying the electric bill, printing programs, buying supplies, etc.
Arts programming expenses might include (but are not limited to) concert series, visual arts workshops, a season of theatrical productions, or other activities and initiatives conducted with the primary intention of providing arts experiences to the community.
This grant is not intended to support programming that is not arts-focused (although it may contain artistic elements).
Costs that an organization must make to perform its primary, day to day activities that generate revenue
Costs that are unrelated to the core operations of the organization
None
There are no specified priority areas for this grant category.
Applications may be submitted until 11:59 p.m. (Eastern Time) on the deadline date. However, please be aware that staff members will not be available to assist you with questions or technical difficulties after SCAC closes at 5 p.m. that day.
July 1, 2024 – June 30, 2025
GOS grants are awarded on a three-year cycle of approval, but separate contracts are issued for each annual grant period.
For FY24 GOS Group 3 grantees
For new GOS applicants
For all applicants
Exact due dates for your grant will be indicated in your grants portal record.
There is no pre-set funding range.
Grant awards will be based on:
Awards may vary from year to year and are contingent on appropriation of funds by the S.C. General Assembly.
3:1 (grantee:SCAC)
Each dollar awarded must be matched with $3 cash. No in-kind expenses are allowed as part of the applicant’s match in this category.
Are you wondering what makes for a strong application?
The SCAC recommends using the FY25 General Operating Support Grant Evaluation Rubric as a guide when writing your application. Grant panelists will score your application responses based on the criteria within this rubric.
Applications will be reviewed with the criteria of artistic excellence and artistic merit.
The artistic excellence and artistic merit of the arts programming is determined by:
An organization that receives a high score on this section will:
Important note: By “participation” we mean active involvement of any sort by anyone with your organization. Participation includes attendance at events, certainly, but it also includes many other types of engagement, such as taking a class, using a website, serving as a volunteer, providing in-kind goods and services, making financial donations, serving on boards and committees, buying works of art, working as a contracted artist, etc.
The South Carolina Arts Commission’s FY25 General Operating Support Grant Evaluation Rubric | |||||
Organization Health (30%) | |||||
0-1 | 2-3 | 4-6 | 7-8 | ||
Governance | There is no evidence of governance, management, or staffing (paid or volunteer) to support the work of the organization. | There is some evidence of governance, management, and staffing (paid or volunteer) to support the work of the organization. | There is evidence of governance, management, and staffing (paid or volunteer) to support the work of the organization. | There is strong evidence of governance, management, and staffing (paid or volunteer) to support the work of the organization. | |
0-1 | 2-3 | 4-5 | 6-7 | ||
Financial Support for Professional Learning | There is no evidence of investment in professional learning by the organization’s board and staff. | There is some evidence of investment in professional learning by the organization’s board and staff. | There is evidence of investment in professional learning by the organization’s board and staff. | There is strong evidence of investment in professional learning by the organization’s board and staff. | |
0-1 | 2-3 | 4-5 | 6-7 | ||
Planning | There is no evidence of methods for planning or evaluating organizational health. | There is some evidence of methods for planning or evaluating organizational health. | There is evidence of methods for planning or evaluating organizational health. | There is strong evidence of methods for planning or evaluating organizational health. | |
Income | There is no evidence of sufficient income to support stable arts programming or access to cash to cover occasional shortfalls. | There is some evidence of sufficient income to support stable arts programming or access to cash to cover occasional shortfalls. | There is evidence of sufficient income to support stable arts programming or access to cash to cover occasional shortfalls. | There is strong evidence of sufficient income to support stable arts programming or access to cash to cover occasional shortfalls. | |
Programs and Services (40%) | |||||
0 | 1-2 | 3-4 | 5 | ||
Mission Alignment | The arts programs and services are not aligned with the mission. | The arts programs and services are somewhat aligned with the mission. | The arts programs and services are aligned with the mission. | The arts programs and services are closely aligned with the mission. | |
0-1 | 2-3 | 4-5 | 6-7 | ||
Breadth and Quality | The breadth and quality of the arts programs and services are not within the scope of the mission. | The breadth and quality of the arts programs and services are somewhat within the scope of the mission. | The breadth and quality of the arts programs and services are within the scope of the mission. | The breadth and quality of the arts programs and services are clearly within the scope of the mission. |
|
0-1 | 2-3 | 4-5 | 6-7 | ||
Capacity | The organization does not demonstrate the capacity to provide arts programs and services effectively. | The organization demonstrates some capacity to provide arts programs and services effectively. | The organization demonstrates the capacity to provide arts programs and services effectively. | The organization demonstrates strong capacity to provide arts programs and services effectively. | |
0-1 | 2-3 | 4-5 | 6-7 | ||
Programming Intention | The arts programs and services offered are not appropriate for the people, organizations, and communities for whom they are intended. | The arts programs and services offered are appropriate for some of the people, organizations, and communities for whom they are intended. | The arts programs and services offered are appropriate for the people, organizations, and communities for whom they are intended. | The arts programs and services offered are directly designed for the people, organizations, and communities for whom they are intended. | |
0-1 | 2-3 | 4-5 | 6-7 | ||
Understanding Success | There is no demonstrated understanding of what “success” means for the organization. | There is some understanding of what “success” means for the organization. | There is an appropriate understanding of what “success” means for the organization. | There is a strong, clear understanding of what “success” means for the organization. | |
0-1 | 2-3 | 4-5 | 6-7 | ||
Goals | The organization does not demonstrate practical strategies for reaching its goals or improving the quality of its arts programs and services. | The organization demonstrates some practical strategies for reaching its goals and improving the quality of its arts programs and services. | The organization demonstrates practical strategies for reaching its goals and improving the quality of its arts programs and services. | The organization demonstrates strong, practical strategies for reaching its goals and improving the quality of its arts programs and services. |
|
Public Participation (30%) | |||||
0-1 | 2-3 | 4-6 | 7-8 | ||
Knowledge of Participants | There is no understanding of who the organization’s participants are and are not, including an informed awareness of why people do or don’t participate. | There is some understanding of who the organization’s participants are and are not, including an informed awareness of why people do or don’t participate. | There is an understanding of who the organization’s participants are and are not, including an informed awareness of why people do or don’t participate. | There is a strong understanding of who the organization’s participants are and are not, including an informed awareness of why people do or don’t participate. | |
0-1 | 2-3 | 4-6 | 7-8 | ||
Methods | The organization does not have varied or effective methods of engaging the community or maintaining participants. | The organization has somewhat varied and effective methods of engaging the community or maintaining participants. | The organization has varied and effective methods of engaging the community and maintaining participants. | The organization has direct, varied and effective methods of engaging the community and maintaining participants. | |
0-1 | 2-3 | 4-6 | 7-8 | ||
Assessment | The organization does not have methods for assessing participation issues or have practical strategies and partnerships for building participation, within the scope of the mission and the current context of the organization. | The organization has some methods for assessing participation issues and has practical strategies and partnerships for building participation, within the scope of the mission and the current context of the organization. | The organization has methods for assessing participation issues and has practical strategies and partnerships for building participation, within the scope of the mission and the current context of the organization. | The organization has strong methods for assessing participation issues and has practical strategies and partnerships for building participation, within the scope of the mission and the current context of the organization. | |
0 | 1-2 | 3-4 | 5-6 | ||
Board Participation | The organization does not have organizational characteristics of a board, staff, processes, programs, facilities, etc. that promote and facilitate broad participation. | The organization has some organizational characteristics of a board, staff, processes, programs, facilities, etc. that promote and facilitate broad participation. | The organization has organizational characteristics of a board, staff, processes, programs, facilities, etc. that promote and facilitate broad participation. | The organization has strong organizational characteristics of a board, staff, processes, programs, facilities, etc. that promote and facilitate broad participation. | |
Applications are accepted through our grants portal, which uses the Foundant platform.
New to Foundant? For frequently asked questions, registration instructions, and other helpful information, we highly recommend visiting the Grants Portal FAQ, before you begin working in the system.
The initial application will take time to complete, so we strongly advise you to begin well in advance of the deadline. The online application is opened each year at least one month in advance for the upcoming deadline.
The applicant must have an active account in our Grants Portal.
Starting November 16, 2023:
(Available to FY24 GOS Group 3 grantees and new applicants November 16, 2023.)
Not quite ready to apply? You can preview the application before you create an account or start an application.
The Grants Team will review submitted applications for completeness and compliance with guideline and application requirements. A review panel of arts professionals will evaluate the applications based on the published review criteria. An applicant’s panel comments are available to them upon request. Staff will then develop funding recommendations, based on these evaluations and the availability of funds. Recommendations will be presented to the board of commissioners, which makes final award decisions. Award notification is expected after the June 2024 board meeting, pending completion of the state budget process.
If your application is funded, you (and your fiscal agent/receiver, if applicable) will enter into a contractual agreement with the South Carolina Arts Commission, and you must comply with all requirements stated in that contract. You will receive notification and instructions when your contract is available in the Grants Portal. You must submit your completed contract packet, including signatures and other documentation as instructed, by the date indicated in the system. You must also complete all other assigned follow ups by the due date.
Please note: Any significant revisions to grant-funded activities must be approved in writing, in advance, by the SCAC. Significant revisions to grant-funded activities must be emailed to grants@arts.sc.gov to be processed for approval or denial.
Additional details about managing an SCAC grant are available on our agency website.
Payment will be on a reimbursement basis only. Grantees in this category may be eligible for up to two (2) interim payments and one final payment prior to receipt and approval of the grantee’s final report. An accurate pay request, listing only expenses allowable under the program guidelines within the certified time period, must be submitted in order to receive payment for the grant award. Your first grant payment request must be submitted by the date indicated in your online account.
Payment schedule:
*Interim payment requests may be submitted earlier as needed. If an organization needs more time to accumulate expenses before submitting an interim payment request, they must reach out to grants@arts.sc.gov.
ALL GRANTEES are required to file a final report at the end of the grant period. The final report due date is stated in the grant contract. Failure to submit an accurate and complete final report by the due date will result in cancellation of the award and repayment of any funds received. SCAC will not fund applicants who have outstanding final reports.
In addition, failure to file a complete GOS Final Report by the due date will result in a reduction of 15% to your next Operating Support award.
GOS grants are awarded on a three-year cycle, but grantees are required to file a final report at the end of each annual grant period. Submission of your annual final reports for years one and two of the three-year cycle will allow us to assess long-term progress and generate the next year’s contract.
We also highly recommend a visit to our Grants Coaching webpage, for
Missed a group call or session? Look for the video link to access a recording of that presentation.