Goals of the program
Outcomes of the program
Is your city or town ready to become a cultural district*? This page provides guidelines and eligibility for the certification process.
*If you’re looking to become a historic district, we are glad to know it—but we can’t help you. We suggest you check out the information provided by our colleagues at the South Carolina Department of Archives and History or check in with your local historic preservation organization.
Image caption: Representatives from South Carolina Cultural Districts get a tour of the Lancaster Cultural District during a 2024 cohort meeting. Photo credit: Harvee White/SCAC.
Review or download the guidelines for cultural district certification now.
Any city or town applying for state designation of a cultural district must hold a public hearing with adequate notice regarding the proposed district and pass a resolution making a commitment to establish a state-designated cultural district.
This resolution must be passed within one (1) year of making a full application to be certified.
After creating and working with your steering committee and passing a resolution in your local council. You will review these steps towards making a full application.
Your completed application will include the following:
SCAC staff will review the application materials using an evaluation tool—known as a rubric—seek more information if required, and make recommendations to our board. If the application reviewed is satisfactory, the district will be invited to a regularly scheduled meeting of the SCAC board of commissioners to make a short presentation. The board will make all final decisions regarding designation.
FY24 SCAC Cultural Districts Certification Rubric
Cultural District Information – 10% | |||||
0 | 1 | ||||
Proposed Name & Title | Not present | Present | |||
0 | 1 | 2 | |||
Why & How name was decided | Applicant does not provide a reason for their choice of name. | Applicant provides reasoning for their name choice | Applicant provides clear reasoning for how and why they chose the name of their cultural district. | ||
0-1 | 2-3 | 4-5 | |||
District footprint details | Applicant gives few details of the proposed district and includes few or no place-based identifiers, arts landmarks, or local geographic terms. | Applicant gives a succinct description of the general footprint and uses some place-based identifiers, arts landmarks, or local geographic terms. | Applicant gives an extremely succinct description of the proposed district and includes place-based identifiers, arts landmarks, and local geographic terms. | ||
0 | 2 | ||||
Why & how area was chosen | Applicant does not provide clear reasoning for how and why the boundaries were selected. | Applicant provides clear reasoning for how and why the boundaries were selected. | |||
Planning + Creative Placemaking – 10% | |||||
0-1 | 2-4 | 5-7 | 8-10 | ||
Integration | The applicant does not anticipate how the arts, culture, and design will integrate into local systems through certification. | The applicant somewhat anticipates how certification will help integrate arts, culture, and design into local systems. | The applicant adequately anticipates how certification will help future integration of arts, culture, and design into local systems with thought-out reasons. | The applicant distinctly anticipates how certification will help future integration of arts, culture, and design into local systems with clear and thought-out reasons. | |
Narrative – 20% | |||||
0-1 | 2-4 | 5-7 | 8-10 | ||
Description | The narrative does not articulate the community and/or key characteristics of the proposed district. | The narrative articulates some aspects of the community and/or key characteristics of the district. | The narrative articulatesthe existing community and key characteristics of the district. | The narrative thoroughly articulates the existing community and key characteristics of the district. | |
0-1 | 2-4 | 5-7 | 8-10 | ||
Details | Narrative details do not articulate the unique qualities and/ or does not include regularly scheduled programming and events. | Narrative details somewhat articulate the unique qualities and includes some regularly scheduled programming and events. | Narrative details significantly articulate the district’s unique qualities and includes regularly scheduled programming and events. | Narrative details extensively articulate the unique qualities and provides details of regularly scheduled programming and events. | |
Map and Resolution – 10% | |||||
0 | 4 | ||||
Map | An approved map was not submitted. | An approved map has been submitted. | |||
0 | 4 | ||||
Asset list | The approved asset list spreadsheet was not submitted. | The approved asset list spreadsheet has been submitted. | |||
0 | 2 | ||||
Resolution | No resolution is included, or it was included, but passed more than one year prior to application. | The resolution is attached and was passed no more than a year prior to application. | |||
Cultural District Strategic Plan – 20% | |||||
0 | 1-2 | 3 | |||
Action plan | Applicant does not include an action plan. | Applicant includes a manageable and realistic action plan for consistent activities, marketing, and/or programming for the first six months following certification. | Applicant includes an extremely manageable and realistic action plan for consistent activities, marketing, and/or programming for the first six months following certification. | ||
0 | 1-2 | 3 | |||
Management strategies | Applicant does not include management strategies for the district. | There is a detailed management strategy that describes elements of how the cultural district will be run, organized, and programmed by the coordinator and the steering committee. | There is an extremely detailed management strategy that describes multiple elements of how the cultural district will be run, organized, and programmed by the coordinator and the steering committee. | ||
0-1 | 2-3 | 4-5 | |||
Desired outcomes | Applicant has not identified and/or described desired outcomes for the cultural district. | Applicant has identified and described desired outcomes for the cultural district. | Applicant has identified and very specifically described desired outcomes for the cultural district. | ||
0 | 1-2 | 3-4 | 5-6 | ||
Goals + Objectives | The applicant does not include clear goals and objectives for arts-related programs, projects, and activities. | The applicant includes some clear goals and objectives for arts-related programs, projects, and activities for five years, but they are not measurable. | The applicant includes clear goals and objectives for arts-related programs, projects, and activities for five years that can be measured annually. | The applicant includes extremely clear goals and objectives for arts- related programs, projects, and activities for five years that can be measured annually. | |
0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | ||
Baseline data | No baseline data is provided. | There is some baseline data provided enabling an annual assessment of the district. | There is adequate baseline data provided enabling an annual assessment of the district. | There is thorough baseline data provided enabling an in-depth annual assessment of the district. | |
Cultural District Marketing Plan – 15% | |||||
0-1 | 2-3 | 4-5 | |||
Brand development | The development of the district brand does not reflect a clear identity and/or does not include arts-based, creative solutions for discussing or illustrating the district as an entity. | The development of the district brand reflects a clear identity and includes arts-based, creative solutions for discussing or illustrating the district as an entity. | The development of the district brand directly displays a clear identity including arts-based creative solutions for discussing or illustrating the district as an entity - including accessibility considerations. | ||
0-1 | 2-3 | 4-5 | |||
Promotional strategy | There is not a comprehensive promotional strategy for post-certification and achieving district goals. | There is a comprehensive promotional strategy for post-certification and achieving district goals is included along with accessibility considerations. | An extremely comprehensive promotional strategy for post-certification and achieving district goals is included along with accessibility considerations. | ||
0-1 | 2-3 | 4-5 | |||
Social media plan | There is not a social media plan. | The social media plan has been included and commits to marketing through any social media channels. | The social media plan has been included and provides a clear plan for achievable marketing of the district through any social media channels. | ||
Budget + Potential incentives – 8% | |||||
0 | 1-2 | 3-4 | 5-6 | ||
Cultural district budget | The budget is not realistic and/or does not include arts programming and creative placemaking integration. | There is a somewhat realistic budget that includes arts programming and creative placemaking integration. | There is a realistic budget that includes arts programming and creative placemaking integration. | There is a detailed and committed budget that includes arts programming and creative placemaking integration. | |
0 | 1 | 2 | |||
Potential incentives | Applicant does not provide any incentive goals. | Applicant has included incentive goals that may be implemented. | Applicant has included clear incentive goals that are likely to be implemented. | ||
Steering committee – 7% | |||||
0-1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | ||
Member list | The steering committee list names members, with little justification for their inclusion on the committee. | The steering committee list names members, with some justification for their inclusion on the committee. | The steering committee list names members, with justification for their inclusion on the committee. | The steering committee list names members, with clear justification for their inclusion on the committee. | |
0 | 1 | ||||
Planning activities | Applicant does not demonstrate strategic planning through locally defined goals and outcomes. | Applicant demonstrates strategic planning through locally defined goals and outcomes using arts programming and creative placemaking. | |||
0 | 1 | ||||
Measures | Applicant does not include the steering committee’s measures for governance and success indicators. | Applicant includes the steering committee’s measures for governance and success indicators. | |||
0 | 1 | ||||
Potential Challenges | Applicant has does not have a clear understanding of potential challenges. | Applicant has a clear understanding of potential challenges. |
If approved, we will work with local contacts to arrange appropriate announcements, publicity, and public events. If designation is not approved, staff will work with local contacts to address board concerns and determine the feasibility of reapplying.
To document and measure the impact of a cultural district on its community, a state-designated cultural district must provide an annual report to the SCAC which includes a narrative describing activities in the district during the previous year and reporting data that measures the impact and reflects the stated goals of the district. Unless otherwise informed by the public art coordinator, your annual report will be due in May each year.
Along with reviewing and measuring your district’s outcomes and goals as laid out in the strategic plan, your annual report is a place to celebrate the arts and cultural progress made. In line with the data provided during the application stage, this data collection and measurement is intended to evaluate the program in your area. It is used to identify areas of success as well as places for greater focus as your program continues to grow and develop.
Every five (5) years, SCAC staff will evaluate the annual reports, action plans, goals, and outcomes of designated cultural districts to assess the district’s impact and continued viability for state designation. Each district that is up for recertification should prepare a new five-year plan including desired outcomes, goals, and objectives. Prior to submitting this, the district representatives will be required to have a meeting to discuss the evaluation and new plan with SCAC staff.
Districts demonstrating substantial progress or success at accomplishing goals and outcomes, and that demonstrate a continued local commitment to management and promotion of the district, will be recertified for another five-year period.
FY24 SCAC Cultural Districts Recertification Rubric
Planning + Creative Placemaking – 10% | ||||||
0-1 | 2-4 | 5-7 | 8-10 | |||
Integration | The applicant does not anticipate how the arts, culture, and design will integrate into local systems through recertification. | The applicant somewhat anticipates how recertification will help integrate arts, culture, and design into local systems. | The applicant adequately anticipates how recertification will help future integration of arts, culture, and design into local systems with thought-out reasons. | The applicant distinctly anticipates how recertification will help future integration of arts, culture, and design into local systems with clear and thought-out reasons. | ||
Update Map – 15% | ||||||
0 | 8 | |||||
Map | An updated map was not submitted. | An updated map has been submitted. | ||||
0 | 7 | |||||
Asset list | The updated asset list spreadsheet was not submitted. | The updated asset list spreadsheet has been submitted. | ||||
Cultural District Strategic Plan – 25% | ||||||
0-2 | 3-5 | 6-8 | 9-10 | |||
Desired outcomes | The applicant has not identified and/or described desired outcomes for the cultural district. | The applicant has somewhat identified and/or described desired outcomes for the district. | The applicant has identified and described desired outcomes for the cultural district. | The applicant has identified and very specifically described desired outcomes for the cultural district. | ||
0-5 | 6-9 | 10-12 | 13-15 | |||
Goals + Objectives | The applicant does not include clear goals and objectives for arts-related programs, projects, and activities. | The applicant includes some clear goals and objectives for arts-related programs, projects, and activities for the next five years, but they are not measurable. | The applicant includes clear goals and objectives for arts-related programs, projects, and activities for the next five years that can be measured annually. | The applicant includes extremely clear goals and objectives for arts- related programs, projects, and activities for the next five years that can be measured annually. | ||
Baseline Data for the district – 25% | ||||||
0 | 1-6 | 7-12 | 13-19 | 20-25 | ||
Baseline data | No baseline data is provided. | Minimal baseline data is provided. | There is some baseline data provided enabling an annual assessment of the district. | There is adequate baseline data provided enabling an annual assessment of the district. | There is thorough baseline data provided enabling an in-depth annual assessment of the district. | |
Cultural District Marketing Plan – 15% | ||||||
0-1 | 2-3 | 4-5 | ||||
Collateral | There is no marketing collateral. | The marketing collateral has been included. | The marketing collateral and planned collateral has been included along with accessibility considerations. | |||
0-1 | 2-3 | 4-5 | ||||
Promotional strategy | There is not a comprehensive promotional strategy for post-recertification and achieving district goals. | There is a comprehensive promotional strategy for post-recertification and achieving district goals is included. | An extremely comprehensive promotional strategy for post-recertification and achieving district goals is included along with accessibility considerations. | |||
0-1 | 2-3 | 4-5 | ||||
Social media plan | There is not a social media plan. | The social media plan has been included and commits to marketing through any social media channels. | The social media plan has been included and provides a clear plan for achievable marketing of the district through any social media channels. | |||
Steering committee – 10% | ||||||
0-2 | 3-5 | 6-8 | 9-10 | |||
Member list | The steering committee list names members, with little justification for their inclusion on the committee. | The steering committee list names members, with some justification for their inclusion on the committee. | The steering committee list names members, with justification for their inclusion on the committee. | The steering committee list names at least five active members, with clear justification for their inclusion on the committee. |
The SCAC retains the right to non-certify a cultural district if they determine that a district is not meeting the criteria and responsibilities necessary to remain in good standing. Additionally, a cultural district may choose to end their status as a cultural district at any time.
Non-certification, whether voluntary or involuntary, means all rights and privileges regarding cultural districts grants, technical assistance and advice, and resources associated with cultural districts will no longer be available. Use of the “Cultural District of South Carolina” name and logo on any platform is prohibited after non-certification.
A cultural district committee may choose to end their status before the end of their 5-year term, or come to the end of their term and choose not to recertify.
Voluntary Non-Certification Process
If at the end of the recertification process the SCAC determines that a cultural district has not met the criteria and responsibilities necessary to remain in good standing, the Public Art Coordinator will notify the committee chair and give them 60 days to address any insufficiencies.
Involuntary Non-Certification Process
To discuss the program and ask any questions you might have, please contact Public Art Coordinator Harvee L. White (803.734.8253 | hlwhite@arts.sc.gov).