Purpose
To support artists’ and organizations’ quality arts projects, marketing, and events and/or their commitment to improving themselves and/or their work artistically
Who's Eligible
Artists, nonprofit organizations, and units of government
Funding
Up to $2,500 within a fiscal year
Matching Requirement
1:2 for artists, 1:1 for organizations
These grants support an artist’s or organization’s quality arts project or program or their commitment to improving themselves and/or their work artistically. Among other things, the Arts Project Support (APS) grant can be used to build and/or increase technical, online, or virtual capacity; for supporting art projects in public spaces, community arts development, or professional development (PD) for artists and arts administration staff.
Please Note
Join SCAC staff for applicant coaching on Zoom.
Please note
Coaching videos are provided as a guide for applicants in the stated fiscal year and information provided might not apply to subsequent years.
Who Meet All the Following Requirements:
That Meet All the Following Requirements:
In accordance with federal government policy, all organizations – including (but not limited to) private schools, public school districts, government entities, and nonprofit organizations – must provide a valid UEI number* to receive an SCAC grant award.
*Learn about the Unique Entity ID (UEI)
Note: If an applicant organization is using a fiscal agent/receiver, separate UEI numbers must be provided for both the applicant organization and the fiscal agent/receiver. Exceptions to separate UEI numbers are organizations run by a local government or a school district.
Grant funds must be used for actual project costs, defined as consumable and non-consumable items needed to complete the proposed project (including, but not limited to):
For all grant-funded activities (including group lectures, demonstrations, performances, residencies, and short-term arts teaching experiences), the use of S.C. Arts Directory members is required for school and school district grantees and encouraged for grantees that are organizations.
Artists identified as Verified Teaching Artists on the S.C. Arts Directory have been additionally vetted by SCAC through the submission of sample lesson plans, recorded teaching samples, and letters of recommendation. For any grantee whose grant-funded activities are for K-12 student services, SCAC encourages the use of Verified Teaching Artists. Many school districts require the use of SCAC Verified Teaching Artists for classroom residencies. If working in a school environment, always check with both the individual school and the school district about policies related to hiring artists, arts organizations, and teaching artists.
No more than 10% of the total grant funds may be used for indirect costs (general overhead expenses not directly tied to the project). The remaining 90% must go toward direct costs, which are necessary to carry out the funded project.
This ensures that most of the funding directly benefits the project while allowing some flexibility for necessary overhead costs.
All grant applicants must ensure their applications, proposed projects, and any related materials comply with all applicable federal, state, and local laws. This includes SC Code § 16-15-305 (2024), which prohibits the dissemination of obscene materials.
Obscene content is strictly prohibited in grant applications and any proposed project activities. Applications that include materials or activities determined to be obscene will not be reviewed or considered for funding.
No component of an SCAC-funded project, including those funded with SCAC funds and those funded with matching funds, can fall into this category. Failure to comply with these regulations may result in the termination of funding and other legal consequences.
We strongly encourage all applicants to carefully review the full legal text of SC Code § 16-15-305 (2024) to ensure their proposals are in full compliance.
Special consideration will be given to individuals or organizations that are located in and/or have projects in SCAC’s Opportunity Initiative Counties:
Applicants located in or serving an Opportunity County will receive bonus points added to their final scores. Applicants outside of Opportunity Counties are neither penalized nor discouraged from applying in any way.
Application period: August 25, 2026 – February 25, 2027.
Applications must be submitted at least five (5) weeks before grant-funded activities begin or purchases are made. Your project start date will be no sooner than 35 days after you submit your application.
Applications may be submitted until 11:59 p.m. (Eastern Time) on the deadline date. However, staff members are not available to assist you with questions or technical difficulties after SCAC closes at 5 p.m.
All grant-supported activities must be implemented between September 29, 2026 and May 31, 2027.
The maximum eligible award amount for each APS application is determined by the project budget and category matching requirements.
Federal funding note: This grant might be funded using federal dollars. The SCAC will notify the grantee if federal dollars are used. In the event federal dollars are used, the grantee’s match must not consist of federal funding.
1:2 (grantee:SCAC – the grantee must match each SCAC dollar with 50 cents of their own funds)
1:1 (grantee:SCAC)
The primary contact listed in the grant application must be the main point of contact throughout the application process and, if awarded, during the grant period.
For organizations, the primary contact must be an employee or active volunteer of the organization applying for the grant. Intermediaries, such as hired consultants or external representatives, are not permitted to serve as the primary point of contact. The primary contact will be responsible for all communications with the SCAC, including responding to inquiries, providing updates, and submitting required documentation. Failure to adhere to this requirement may result in disqualification from the grant process or revocation of awarded funds.
This grant program is funded in part by a generous award from the John and Susan Bennett Memorial Arts Fund of the Coastal Community Foundation of SC. As stipulated in your contract, credit must be given to this source, in addition to SCAC and the National Endowment for the Arts, in all advertising, news releases, printed materials, and promotion and publicity. Details about the Coastal Community Foundation of SC are available on their website.
Are you wondering what makes for a strong application?
The SCAC recommends using the rubric in this section as a guide when writing your application. Grant panelists will score your application responses based on the criteria within this rubric.
FY27 Arts Project Support Grant Application - Evaluation Rubric for |
||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
Project Details – 40% of total score |
||||
| Activity Timeline | 0 points: There is no activity timeline or the timeline is not within the start and end dates. | 1-2 points: There is a limited activity timeline within the start and end dates. | 3-4 points: There is a clear activity timeline within the start and end dates. | 5 points: There is a comprehensive activity timeline within the start and end dates. |
| Project Goals and Expected Outcomes | 0-2 points: The project goals are not provided OR the provided goals do not align with the expected outcomes. | 3-5 points: The project goals are somewhat achievable and somewhat align with the expected outcomes. | 6-8 points: The project goals are outlined, achievable, and align with the expected outcomes. | 9-10 points: The project goals are distinctly outlined, achievable, and properly align with the expected outcomes. |
| Funding Importance | 0-2 points: Little to no information is provided about how grant funding will support the project's outcome and goals. | 3-4 points: The applicant somewhat explains how grant funding supports the project's outcome and goals. | 5-6 points: The applicant explains how grant funding will support the project's outcome and goals. | 7 points: The applicant explains in specific detail how grant funding will support the project's outcome and goals. |
| Activity Location | 0 points: No activity location(s) are listed. | 5 points: Activity location(s) are clearly listed. | ||
| Key Personnel | 0-2 points: Key personnel are not identified and qualifications are not relevant to the proposed project or have little to no experience or capacity to carry out project activities. | 3-4 points: Key personnel are somewhat identified, qualifications are relevant to the proposed project, and experience demonstrates the capacity to carry out project activities. | 5-6 points: Key personnel are identified, qualifications are relevant to the proposed project, and experience demonstrates the capacity to successfully carry out project activities. | 7 points: Key personnel are clearly identified, qualifications are extremely relevant to the proposed project, and experience demonstrates the capacity to successfully carry out project activities. |
| Promotion Strategy | 0 points: There is little to no planned promotion strategy for the project. | 1-2 points: There is a limited plan to promote the project. | 3-4 points: There is a clear plan to promote the project. | 5-6 points: There is an extremely detailed plan to promote the project. |
Project Impact – 30% of total score |
||||
| Importance to Artist or Community | 0-3 points: The project has little to no importance to the applicant and/or the community it serves as there is minimal supporting detail provided. | 4-7 points: The project is somewhat important to the applicant and/or the community it serves as there are some supporting details provided. | 8-11 points: The project is important to the applicant and/or the community it serves as there are supporting details provided. | 12-15 points: The project is highly important to the applicant and/or the community it serves as there are specific and many supporting details provided. |
| Success Measurements | 0-3 points: There is little to no plan to collect data or the plan is unclear on how success of the project will be measured. | 4-7 points: The plan to collect data to measure the success of the project is limited. | 8-11 points: There is a plan to collect data to measure the success of the project. | 12-15 points: The applicant has a structured plan to collect data to measure the success of the project thoroughly. |
Budget – 15% of total score |
||||
| Budget Itemization | 0 points: The budget lacks detail or expenses and income are not itemized. | 1-2 points: The budget includes some detail with expenses and income items partially itemized. | 3-4 points: The budget is detailed with all expenses and income items itemized. | 5 points: The budget is extremely detailed with all expenses and income items specifically itemized. |
| Budget Resources | 0-2 points: The budget is not balanced and/or an unrealistic estimate of itemized project expenses and income sources to support the project. | 3-5 points: The budget somewhat demonstrates a balanced and realistic estimate of itemized project expenses and income sources to support the project. | 6-8 points: The budget demonstrates a balanced and realistic estimate of itemized project expenses and income sources to support the project. | 9-10 points: The budget clearly demonstrates a balanced and realistic estimate of itemized project expenses and reliable income sources to support the project. |
Support Materials – 15% of total score |
||||
| Work/Support Material Credit | 0 points: Credits are not clearly labeled, accurate, OR indicate the artist or organization did not produce the submitted samples or materials. | 1-2 points: Credits are partial or inaccurate and do not indicate that the artist or organization produced the submitted samples or materials. | 3-4 points: Credits are clearly and accurately labeled to show the artist or organization produced the submitted samples or materials. | 5 points: Credits are thoroughly and accurately presented, clearly showing the artist or organization produced the submitted samples or materials. |
| Work/Support Material Relevance | 0-2 points: Samples or materials do not show the applicant's skills, resources, and capacity to implement the project. | 3-5 points: Samples or materials do not adequately show the applicant’s skills, resources, and capacity to implement the project. | 6-8 points: Samples or materials effectively show the applicant's skills, resources, and capacity to implement the project. | 9-10 points: Samples or materials strongly show the applicant’s skills, resources, and capacity to implement the project. |
Are you wondering what makes for a strong application?
The SCAC recommends using the rubric in this section as a guide when writing your application. Grant panelists will score your application responses based on the criteria within this rubric.
FY27 Arts Project Support Grant Application - Evaluation Rubric for |
||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
Professional Development Information – 35% of total score |
||||
| Activity Timeline | 0-2 points: There is no professional development activity timeline or the timeline is not within the start and end dates. | 3-5 points: There is a limited professional development activity timeline within the start and end dates. | 6-8 points: There is a clear professional development activity timeline within the start and end dates. | 9-10 points: There is a comprehensive professional development activity timeline within the start and end dates. |
| Professional Development Provider Identification | 0 points: No individuals and/or institutions providing professional development are identified. | 5 points: Individuals and/or institutions providing professional development are clearly identified. An accessible, current, and relevant website link to the opportunity is provided. | ||
| Professional Development Provider Information | 0-2 points: Little or no information is provided about professional development providers and/or their qualifications or ability to deliver and lead professional development, or they do not have sufficient qualities or abilities to lead professional development. | 3-7 points: Some of the professional development providers are qualified and able to deliver and lead professional development. | 8-11 points: The professional development providers have qualifications/abilities to deliver and lead professional development. | 12-15 points: The professional development providers have expert-level qualifications/ abilities to deliver and lead professional development. |
| PD Location | 0 points: No information about the location is provided. | 5 points: Specific information is provided about the professional development location. | ||
Professional Development Impact – 45% of total score |
||||
| Content Relevance | 0-2 points: The professional development content has little or no relevance. | 3-7 points: The professional development content is somewhat relevant. | 8-11 points: The professional development content is relevant. | 12-15 points: The professional development content is extremely relevant. |
| Impact on Knowledge/Skills | 0-2 points: Little to no information is provided about knowledge or skills to be gained. | 3-7 points: The knowledge or skills to be gained are partially described. | 8-11 points: The knowledge or skills to be gained are clearly described. | 12-15 points: The knowledge or skills to be gained are thoroughly described. |
| Work/Career Impact | 0-2 points: There is little or no evidence that professional development will benefit skills and knowledge. | 3-7 points: There is some evidence that professional development will benefit skills and knowledge to improve future work or career. | 8-11 points: There is evidence that professional development will benefit skills and knowledge to improve future work or career. | 12-15 points: There is strong evidence that professional development will benefit skills and knowledge to improve future work or career. |
Budget – 20% of total score |
||||
| Budget Itemization | 0 points: The budget lacks detail, or expenses and income are not itemized. | 1-2 points: The budget includes some detail with expenses and income items partially itemized. | 3-4 points: The budget is detailed with all expenses and income items itemized. | 5 points: The budget is extremely detailed with all expenses and income items specifically itemized. |
| Budget Resources | 0-3 points: The budget is not balanced and/or an unrealistic estimate of itemized project expenses and income sources to support the project. | 4-7 points: The budget somewhat demonstrates a balanced and realistic estimate of itemized project expenses and income sources to support the project. | 8-11 points: The budget demonstrates a balanced and realistic estimate of itemized project expenses and income sources to support the project. | 12-15 points: The budget clearly demonstrates a balanced and realistic estimate of itemized project expenses and reliable income sources to support the project. |
Applications are accepted through our grants portal, which uses Foundant.
New to Foundant? For frequently asked questions, registration instructions, and other helpful information, we highly recommend visiting the Grants Portal FAQ before you begin working in the system.
Applicants must have an active account in our grants portal (Foundant).
If you have previously used Submittable to apply for other SCAC grants or programs, please note that Foundant is a different system. Your Submittable credentials will not work; you will need a Foundant account to apply for this grant.
If you have used the grants portal as both an artist and for a school or organization, be sure you log on with the correct account to apply for this grant.
The SCAC recognizes that applicants may choose to use artificial intelligence (AI) tools as part of their grant preparation process. The following policy outlines acceptable and prohibited uses of AI in connection with grant applications and funded projects.
Applying for this grant indicates that you, the applicant, agree to the terms of this policy.
Support materials show you have the necessary skills, resources, and capacity needed to complete the proposed project.
You must submit at least two (2) support materials; you may submit up to five (5).
Support materials might include, but are not limited to:
For each support material you must provide a description and explain its relationship to the project.
Support materials may be uploaded, or you may provide a link to the support material(s). If providing a link, it must be accessible without a password, login credentials, or account for that platform. Do not include websites or links for which a password is required.
As part of your application, you must submit samples of your artistic work. Work samples demonstrate a participating artist’s skill level and expertise relevant to the project.
If your proposed project is multi-disciplinary, you must select one primary discipline for which to submit work samples. Work samples must be of the highest possible quality.
Requirements for Work Samples
Your submitted work samples must:
Submitting Work Samples
All links (URLs) must be accessible without a login, password, or account. You may need to upload materials to a public-facing platform (e.g., Dropbox, Google Drive, YouTube) to meet this requirement. If your work samples cannot be made available online, contact the grants office.
Work Sample Limits
Evaluators will only review up to the maximum stated in the guidelines for each sample type. The limit for each sample type is stated below. Extra materials will not be considered.
Provide a link to the type of performance sample that applies to your discipline:
For each work sample, you must provide:
Provide a link to the type of production sample that applies to your discipline:
For each work sample, you must provide:
Provide a link to the type of sample that applies to your discipline:
For each work sample, you must provide the:
Provide a link to the type of sample that applies to your discipline:
For each work sample, you must provide the:
Provide a link to the type of sample that applies to your discipline:
For each work sample, you must provide the:
Provide a link to the type of sample that applies to your discipline:
For each work sample, you must provide the:
Provide a link to the type of sample that applies to your discipline:
For each work sample, you must provide the:
Provide a link to the type of sample that applies to your discipline:
For each work sample, you must provide the:
Upload work samples that apply to your discipline:
For each work sample, you must provide the:
Applications go through a two-step review process.
The grants team reviews applications for completion and compliance with guidelines and application requirements. Incomplete or noncompliant applications will not move on to evaluation.
Grant reviewers evaluate complete applications based on the published review criteria. Reviewer comments are available to applicants upon request.
Award decisions are based on applicant scores and the availability of funds; award approvals are made by the SCAC Board of Commissioners. Award notification is expected within four (4) to five (5) weeks of submission.
If your application is funded, you (and your fiscal agent, if applicable) will sign a contract with the South Carolina Arts Commission. By signing, all parties agree to follow applicable federal, state, and local laws and regulations as outlined in the contract.
You’ll receive an email with instructions when your contract is ready in the grants portal. Submit your completed contract—including all required signatures and documents—by the deadline shown in the system. Complete any other assigned follow-up items by their due dates as well.
Payment will be on a reimbursement basis only and will be released upon receipt and approval of your final report.
SCAC artist grant awards are considered taxable income.
ALL GRANTEES are required to submit a final report at the end of the grant period. The final report due date is stated in the grant contract.
If you fail to meet the grant requirements, SCAC may take any combination of the following actions:
Before taking action, SCAC will make a good-faith effort to contact you to reach a resolution. See the “Delinquent Grantee Communication Policy” below.
A grant is considered delinquent if the grantee fails to complete any of the following tasks:
Upon identifying delinquency, the SCAC Grants Office will:
Extensions may be granted for emergencies (e.g., natural disasters, documented organizational crises) at the discretion of the SCAC Executive Director.

We also highly recommend a visit to our Grants Coaching webpage, for
Did you miss a group call or session? Look for the video link to access a recording of that presentation.