Purpose
To support artists’ and organizations’ quality arts projects, marketing, and events and/or their commitment to improving themselves and/or their work artistically
Who's Eligible
Artists, nonprofit organizations, and units of government
Funding
Up to $2,500 within a fiscal year
Matching Requirement
1:2 for artists, 1:1 for organizations
These grants support an artist’s or organization’s quality arts project or program or their commitment to improving themselves and/or their work artistically. Among other things, the APS grant can be used to build and/or increase technical, online, or virtual capacity; for supporting art projects in public spaces, community arts development, or professional development for artists and arts administration staff.
Please Note
Grant guidelines are subject to change until the application opens.
The applicant must meet all the following eligibility requirements:
In accordance with federal government policy, all organizations – including (but not limited to) private schools, public school districts, government entities, and nonprofit organizations – must provide a valid UEI number* to receive an SCAC grant award.
*Learn about the Unique Entity ID (UEI)
Note: If an applicant organization is using a fiscal agent/receiver, separate UEI numbers must be provided for both the applicant organization and the fiscal agent/receiver. Exceptions to separate UEI numbers are organizations run by a local government or a school district.
Grant funds must be used for actual project costs, defined as consumable and non-consumable items needed to complete the proposed project (including, but not limited to):
These grant funds cannot be used for:
These grant funds cannot be used for:
None.
Priority will be given to individuals or organizations that have projects in SCAC’s Opportunity Initiative Counties:
At least five (5) weeks before the project begins, for projects beginning on or after August 6, 2024.
Here are some time-specific deadlines:
Applications may be submitted until 11:59 p.m. (Eastern Time) on the deadline date. However, please be aware that staff members will not be available to assist you with questions or technical difficulties after SCAC closes at 5 p.m. that day.
All grant-supported activities must be implemented between August 6, 2024 and May 31, 2025.
If your proposed project is scheduled to end after May 31, please contact us BEFORE beginning your application.
Up to $2,500 within a fiscal year, in up to two APS grant awards.
The maximum eligible award amount for each APS application is determined by the project budget and category matching requirements.
Federal funding note: This grant might be funded using federal dollars. The SCAC will notify the grantee if federal dollars are used. In the event federal dollars are used, the grantee’s match must not consist of federal funding.
For Artists
1:2 (grantee:SCAC – the grantee must match each SCAC dollar with fifty cents of their own funds)
SCAC artist grant awards are considered taxable income.
For Organizations
1:1 (grantee:SCAC)
Are you wondering what makes for a strong application?
The SCAC recommends using the rubric in this section as a guide when writing your application. Grant panelists will score your application responses based on the criteria within this rubric.
FY26 Arts Project Support Grant Application Evaluation Rubric: Project Support |
||||
---|---|---|---|---|
Project Details – 40% of total score |
||||
Project Goals and Expected Outcomes | 0-2 points: The project goals are not provided OR the provided goals do not align with the expected outcomes. | 3-5 points: The project goals are vague, somewhat achievable, and somewhat align with the expected outcomes. | 6-8 points: The project goals are outlined, achievable, and align with the expected outcomes. | 9-10 points: The project goals are distinctly outlined, achievable, and properly align with the expected outcomes. |
Funding Importance | 0-2 points: No information is provided about how grant funding will support the project's outcome and goals. | 3-4 points: The applicant limitedly explains how grant funding supports the project's outcome and goals. | 5-6 points: The applicant explains how grant funding will support the project's outcome and goals. | 7 points: The applicant explains in specific detail how grant funding will support the project's outcome and goals. |
Activity Timeline | 0 points: There is no activity timeline OR the timeline does not accomplish the project's goals. | 1-2 points: There is a limited activity timeline that accomplishes the project's goals. | 3-4 points: There is a clear activity timeline that accomplishes the project's goals. | 5 points: There is a comprehensive activity timeline that accomplishes the project's goals. |
Activity Location | 0 points: No activity location(s) are listed. | 5 points: Activity location(s) are clearly listed. | ||
Key Personnel | 0-2 points: The applicant identifies key administrative and artistic personnel who have limited abilities to lead and complete project activities with minimal commitment to artistic experiences. | 3-4 points: The applicant identifies key administrative and artistic personnel who have some ability to lead and complete project activities with commitment to artistic experiences. | 5-6 points: The applicant identifies key administrative and artistic personnel who have the ability to lead and complete project activities with a clear commitment to artistic experiences. | 7 points: The applicant identifies key administrative and artistic personnel who have high abilities to lead and complete project activities with a strong commitment to artistic experiences. |
Promotion Strategy | 0 points: There is no planned promotion strategy for the project. | 1-2 points: There is a vague plan to promote the project. | 3-4 points: There is a clear plan to promote the project. | 5-6 points: There is an extremely detailed plan to promote the project. |
Project Impact – 30% of total score |
||||
Importance to Artist or Community | 0-3 points: The project is not important to the applicant and/or the community it serves. | 4-7 points: The project is somewhat important to the applicant and/or the community it serves. | 8-11 points: The project is important to the applicant and/or the community it serves. | 12-15 points: The project is highly important to the applicant and/or the community it serves. |
Success Measurements | 0-3 points: There is no plan to collect data or the plan is unclear on how success of the project will be measured. | 4-7 points: The applicant's plan to collect data to measure the success of the project is vague. | 8-11 points: The applicant has a plan to collect data to measure the success of the project. | 12-15 points: The applicant has a structured plan to collect data to measure the success of the project thoroughly. |
Budget – 15% of total score |
||||
Budget Itemization | 0-1 points: The budget lacks detail, or expenses and income are not itemized. | 1-2 points: The budget includes some detail with expenses and income items partially itemized. | 3-4 points: The budget is detailed with all expenses and income items fully itemized. | 5 points: The budget is extremely detailed with all expenses and income items itemized. |
Budget Resources | 0-2 points: The budget is not balanced and/or an unrealistic estimate of itemized project expenses and income sources to support the project. | 3-5 points: The budget somewhat demonstrates a balanced and realistic estimate of itemized project expenses and income sources to support the project. | 6-8 points: The budget demonstrates a balanced and realistic estimate of itemized project expenses and income sources to support the project. | 9-10 points: The budget clearly demonstrates a balanced and realistic estimate of itemized project expenses and reliable income sources to support the project. |
Work Samples or Support Materials – 15% of total score |
||||
Age of Samples or Materials | 0 points: Some materials are older than five years (from 2019 or earlier). | 5 points: All materials are five years old (from 2020) or younger (2021 to this year). | ||
Credit of Samples or Materials | 0 points: Credits are not clearly labeled, accurate, OR indicate the artist or organization did not produce the submitted samples or materials. | 1-2 points: Credits are vague or inaccurate and do not indicate the artist or organization that produced the submitted samples or materials. | 3-4 points: Credits are clearly and accurately labeled to show the artist or organization produced the submitted samples or materials. | 5 points: Credits are thoroughly and accurately presented, clearly showing the artist or organization produced the submitted samples or materials. |
Relevance of Samples or Materials | 0 points: Samples or materials do not show the applicant's ability to implement their project. | 1-2 points: Samples or materials do not adequately show the applicant’s ability to implement the project. | 3-4 points: Samples or materials effectively show the applicant's ability to implement their project. | 5 points: Samples or materials strongly show the applicant’s ability to implement the program. |
Are you wondering what makes for a strong application?
The SCAC recommends using the rubric in this section as a guide when writing your application. Grant panelists will score your application responses based on the criteria within this rubric.
FY26 Arts Project Support Grant Application Evaluation Rubric: |
||||
---|---|---|---|---|
Professional Development Information – 35% of total score |
||||
Professional Development Provider Identification | 0 points: No individuals and/or institutions providing training are identified. | 10 points: Individuals and/or institutions providing PD are clearly identified. An accessible, current, and relevant website link to the opportunity is provided. | ||
Professional Development Provider Information | 0-2 points: Little or no information is stated about PD providers and/or their qualifications or abilities to deliver and lead professional development. | 3-7 points: Some of the PD providers are qualified and able to deliver and lead professional development. | 8-11 points: The PD providers have qualifications/abilities to deliver and lead professional development. | 12-15 points: The PD providers have expert-level qualifications/abilities to deliver and lead professional development. |
Professional Development Duration and Location(s) | 0 points: Little or no information about the duration and/or location is provided. | 10 points: Specific information is provided about the professional development duration and where it will take place. | ||
Professional Development Impact – 45% of total score |
||||
Content Relevance | 0-2 points: The PD content has little or no relevance to the attendee(s) and their goals. | 3-7 points: The PD content is somewhat relevant to the attendee(s) and their goals. | 8-11 points: The PD content is relevant to the attendee(s) and their goals. | 12-15 points: The PD content is relevant, practical, and specific to the attendee(s) and their goals. |
Impact on Knowledge/Skills | 0-2 points: Little to no information is provided on knowledge or skills to be gained. | 3-7 points: Intended knowledge or skills to be gained are vague. | 8-11 points: The intended knowledge or skills to be gained are clearly described. | 12-15 points: The intended knowledge or skills to be gained are thoroughly described. |
Impact on Attendee's Work | 0-2 points: There is little or no evidence that PD will benefit the attendee's skills and knowledge. | 3-7 points: There is some evidence that PD will benefit the attendee's skills and knowledge to improve/further their work or career. | 8-11 points: There is evidence that PD will benefit the attendee's skills and knowledge to improve/further their work or career. | 12-15 points: There is strong evidence that PD will benefit the attendee's skills and knowledge to improve/further their work or career. |
Budget – 20% of total score |
||||
Budget Itemization | 0 points: The budget lacks detail, or expenses and income are not itemized. | 1-2 points: The budget includes some detail with expenses and income items partially itemized. | 3-4 points: The budget is detailed with all expenses and income items fully itemized. | 5 points: The budget is extremely detailed with all expenses and income items itemized. |
Budget Resources | 0-3 points: The budget is not balanced and/or an unrealistic estimate of itemized project expenses and income sources to support the project. | 4-7 points: The budget somewhat demonstrates a balanced and realistic estimate of itemized project expenses and income sources to support the project. | 8-11 points: The budget demonstrates a balanced and realistic estimate of itemized project expenses and income sources to support the project. | 12-15 points: The budget clearly demonstrates a balanced and realistic estimate of itemized project expenses and reliable income sources to support the project. |
Click for a printer-friendly professional development rubric.
Applications are accepted through our grants portal, which uses the Foundant platform.
New to Foundant? For frequently asked questions, registration instructions, and other helpful information, we highly recommend visiting the Grants Portal FAQ before you begin working in the system.
Applicants must have an active account in our grants portal (Foundant).
If you have previously used Submittable to apply for other SCAC grants or programs, please note that Foundant is a different system. Your Submittable credentials will not work; you will need a Foundant account to apply for this grant.
If you have used the grants portal as both an artist and for a school or organization, be sure you log on with the correct account to apply for this grant.
As part of your application, you will provide support materials and/or samples of your artistic work.
Specific requirements for these materials are outlined in the application. You may need to create new electronic files (documents, video files, etc.) to submit materials that meet the length, content, formatting, and other specifications. Evaluators will not review additional material beyond the stated maximum amount.
Additional guidance is available on our support materials page.
Video: Our Grants Coaching Call for Emerging Artist applicants included discussion of how to select work samples.
The Grants Team will review submitted applications for completeness and compliance with guideline and application requirements. An external panel consisting of arts professionals will evaluate completed applications based on the published review criteria and priority areas. An applicant’s panel comments are available to them upon request. Staff will then develop funding recommendations, based on these evaluations and the availability of funds. Award notification is expected within four (4) to five (5) weeks of submission.
If your application is funded, you (and/or your fiscal agent/receiver, if applicable) will enter into a contractual agreement with the South Carolina Arts Commission. All parties agree to comply with all applicable federal, state, and local laws, statutes, regulations, executive orders, provisions, and requirements stated in the contract.
You will receive notification and instructions when your contract is available in the grants portal. You must submit your completed contract packet, including signatures and other documentation as instructed, by the date indicated in the system. You must also complete all other assigned follow-ups by the due date.
Please note: Any significant revisions to grant-funded activities must be approved in writing, in advance, by the SCAC. Significant revisions to grant-funded activities must be emailed to grants@arts.sc.gov to be processed for approval or denial.
Additional details about managing an SCAC grant are available on our agency website.
For Artists: Payment of 20% of the grant award will be released upon receipt and approval of a completed contract packet. The remaining 80% will be paid on an expense reimbursement basis, released upon receipt and approval of a completed final report.
For Organizations: Payment will be on a reimbursement basis only and will be released upon receipt and approval of your final report.
This grant program is funded in part by a generous award from the John and Susan Bennett Memorial Arts Fund of the Coastal Community Foundation of SC. As stipulated in your contract, credit must be given to this source, in addition to SCAC and the National Endowment for the Arts, in all advertising, news releases, printed materials, and promotion and publicity. Details about the Coastal Community Foundation of SC are available on their website.
ALL GRANTEES are required to submit a final report at the end of the grant period. The final report due date is stated in the grant contract. Failure to submit an accurate and complete final report by the due date will result in cancellation of the award and repayment of any funds received. SCAC will not fund applicants who have outstanding final reports.
If you are seeking advisement, please contact Deputy Director Ce Scott-Fitts (803.734.8203 | cscottfitts@arts.sc.gov) before submitting an application.
We also highly recommend a visit to our Grants Coaching webpage, for
Did you miss a group call or session? Look for the video link to access a recording of that presentation.