Purpose
To support arts education programs for Preschool (3K-4K) and/or K-12 students during the school term (including beyond the school day), through both traditional and non-traditional providers
Who's Eligible
Most S.C. nonprofit organizations (arts & non-arts), colleges and universities, and units of government
Funding
Up to $15,000
Matching Requirement
1:2 (grantee:SCAC)
This grant supports quality arts education programs for preschool (3K-4K) and/or K-12 students during the school term (including beyond the school day), through both traditional providers (arts organizations) and other organizations (e.g., social service, health, community, education) that utilize the arts to meet the educational, developmental, and social needs of preschool (3K-4K) and/or K-12 students. This grant supports projects occurring during the school term 2026-2027. For the purposes of this grant, a term is defined as an academic year.
Activities should
Please Note
Grant guidelines are subject to change until the application opens.
In accordance with federal government policy, all organizations – including (but not limited to) private schools, public school districts, government entities, and nonprofit organizations – must provide a valid UEI number* to receive an SCAC grant award.
*Learn about the Unique Entity ID (UEI)
Note: If an applicant organization is using a fiscal agent/receiver, separate UEI numbers must be provided for both the applicant organization and the fiscal agent/receiver. Exceptions to separate UEI numbers are organizations run by a local government or a school district.
Please Note
Grant funds should supplement (add to) not supplant (replace) your current arts programming budget. Grant funds should allow for project funding that is BEYOND your current budget. Grant funds should NOT REPLACE your current budget so that it can be reallocated.
Examples of eligible in-school and after-school activities include, but are not limited to:
For all grant-funded activities (including group lectures, demonstrations, performances, residencies, and short-term arts teaching experiences), the use of S.C. Arts Directory members is required for school and school district grantees and encouraged for grantees that are organizations.
Artists identified as Verified Teaching Artists on the S.C. Arts Directory have been additionally vetted by SCAC through the submission of sample lesson plans, recorded teaching samples, and letters of recommendation. For any grantee whose grant-funded activities are for K-12 student services, SCAC encourages the use of Verified Teaching Artists. Many school districts require the use of SCAC Verified Teaching Artists for classroom residencies. If working in a school environment, always check with both the individual school and the school district about policies related to hiring artists, arts organizations, and teaching artists.
No more than 10% of the total grant funds may be used for indirect costs (general overhead expenses not directly tied to the project). The remaining 90% must go toward direct costs, which are necessary to carry out the funded project.
This ensures that most of the funding directly benefits the project while allowing some flexibility for necessary overhead costs.
The primary contact listed in the grant application must be the main point of contact throughout the application process and, if awarded, during the grant period.
For organizations, the primary contact must be an employee or active volunteer of the organization applying for the grant. Intermediaries, such as hired consultants or external representatives, are not permitted to serve as the primary point of contact. The primary contact will be responsible for all communications with the SCAC, including responding to inquiries, providing updates, and submitting required documentation. Failure to adhere to this requirement may result in disqualification from the grant process or revocation of awarded funds.
This funding category is highly competitive.
SCAC Opportunity Initiative Counties:
April 23, 2026
Applications may be submitted until 11:59 p.m. (Eastern Time) on the deadline date. However, staff members are not available to assist you with questions or technical difficulties after SCAC closes at 5 p.m.
July 2026 – May 2027*
* All projects must be implemented during the normal school terms of July 1, 2026 through May 15, 2027. Grant activities may not extend into summer programming. If your proposed project is scheduled to end after May 15, please contact us before applying.
Up to $15,000
Interim payments up to 80% before final report.
1:2 (grantee:SCAC)
Are you wondering what makes for a strong application?
The SCAC recommends using the rubric in this section as a guide when writing your application. Grant panelists will score your application responses based on the criteria within this rubric.
FY27 Term Arts Education Grant Application Evaluation Rubric | |||||
Expanding Access to Arts Education – 65% of Total Score | |||||
| Community Need | 0-2 points: There is little to no demonstrated community need for the project or program. The program is not supported with relevant evidence or data. | 3-5 points: There is some demonstrated community need for the project or program. The program is supported with little evidence or data. | 6-8 points: There is appropriate demonstrated community need for the project or program supported with evidence and data. | 9-10 points: There is strong, clear demonstrated community need for the project or program supported with relevant evidence and data. | |
| Educational Goals | 0-3 points: The educational goals of the project are unclear and do not include what students will learn academically, artistically, or otherwise. | 4-6 points: The educational goals of the project are vague but include some learning academically artistically, and otherwise. | 7-9 points: The educational goals of the project are stated and include quality learning academically, artistically, and otherwise. | 10-12 points: The educational goals of the project are clearly stated and include high-quality learning academically, artistically, and otherwise. | |
| Activity Details | 0-1 points: Project activities are vague, unfeasible, or poorly aligned with the project goals. activities lack coherence or sufficient detail to reasonably achieve intended outcomes. | 2-3 points: Project activities are weak, with limited feasibility and unclear alignment with the project goals. Activities have little connection to achieving intended outcomes. | 4-5 points: Project activities are clear, feasible, and connected to the project goals. Activities are logical and support intended outcomes. | 6-7 points: Project activities are clearly defined and feasible with strong connection to the project goals. Activities intentionally work together to support the intended outcomes. | |
| Timeline and Milestones | 0-1 points: Timeline is unclear or missing major phases of project (planning, execution, or evaluation) and/or does not identify milestones. Dates conflict significantly or do not align with "Project Dates." | 2-3 points: Timeline partially outlines the project (planning, execution, and/or evaluation), identifies some milestones, and is mostly aligned with "Project Dates." | 4-5 points: Timeline outlines all phases of the project (planning, execution, and evaluation), identifies key milestones, and is aligned with "Project Dates." | 6 points: Timeline clearly and thoroughly outlines all phases of the project (planning, execution, and evaluation) and identifies key milestones. All dates are specific and fully aligned with "Project Dates." | |
| Student Engagement | 0-2 points: The activities do not engage students in the production of artworks or use arts-based learning strategies. Students are passive participants, observing only. | 3-5 points: The activities inconsistently or partially engage students in the production of artworks or use of arts-based learning strategies. Student participation is limited to exposure with little opportunity for hands-on creation connected to educational goals. | 6-8 points: The activities regularly engage students in the production of artworks or use arts-based learning strategies. Student participation is hands-on and embedded in educational goals. | 9-10 points: The activities actively and meaningfully engage students in the production of artworks or use arts-based learning strategies. Student participation is fully embedded in educational goals. | |
| Educational Standards | 0 points: Activities do not address South Carolina’s 2026 College and Career Ready Standards for Visual and Performing Arts Proficiency or the S.C. Profile of the Ready Kindergartener. | 1-2 points: Few activities address South Carolina’s 2026 College and Career Ready Standards for Visual and Performing Arts Proficiency and/or the S.C. Profile of the Ready Kindergartener in a reasonable way. | 3-4 points: Most activities address South Carolina’s 2026 College and Career Ready Standards for Visual and Performing Arts Proficiency and/or the S.C. Profile of the Ready Kindergartener in a meaningful and reasonable way. | 5 points: All activities address South Carolina’s 2026 College and Career Ready Standards for Visual and Performing Arts Proficiency and/or the S.C. Profile of the Ready Kindergartener in a clear, meaningful, and reasonable way. | |
| Student Outcomes | 0-2 points: Evaluation plan does not include methods of measuring achievement of goals or student outcomes. Measurement strategies are absent or not connected to educational goals or student outcomes. No clear method for collecting or analyzing data is described. | 3-5 points: Evaluation plan includes some methods of measuring achievement of goals and/or student outcomes. Measurement strategies are vague or loosely connected to educational goals or student outcomes. Methods for collecting or analyzing data are minimally developed. | 6-8 points: Evaluation plan includes defined methods of measuring achievement of goals and student outcomes. Measurement strategies are relevant and aligned with educational goals and/or student outcomes. Methods for collecting and analyzing data are appropriate. | 9-10 points: Evaluation plan includes clear and intentional methods of measuring achievement of goals and student outcomes. Measurement strategies are specific and directly aligned with educational goals and student outcomes. Methods for collecting and analyzing data are highly developed and utilize both quantitative and qualitative data. | |
| Project Growth | 0 points: The organization has not demonstrated growth or change within its grant-funded project or program from previous years. | 1-2 points: The organization has demonstrated little growth and/or change to its grant-funded project or program from previous years. | 3-4 points: The organization has demonstrated growth and/or change in its grant-funded project or program from previous years. | 5 points: The organization has demonstrated significant growth and/or change in its grant-funded project or program from previous years. | |
Organizational Capacity – 30% of Total Score | |||||
| Organization and Mission | 0 points: The project or program shows little to no alignment with the organization’s stated mission. | 1-2 points: The project or program has some connection to the organization's mission, but the alignment is weak, unclear, or indirect. | 3-4 points: The project or program aligns with the organization's mission in clear and logical ways, even if it is not the central focus of the mission. | 5 points: The project or program is clearly and directly aligned with the organization's mission. | |
| Commitment to Artistic Quality | 0 points: The project does not provide a high-quality artistic experience. There is insufficient training, artistic experience, or program design to ensure quality instruction or meaningful artistic outcomes. | 1-2 points: The project provides a basic or inconsistent artistic experience. There is limited training, artistic experience, and/or program design to ensure quality instruction or meaningful artistic outcomes. | 3-4 points: The project provides a solid, quality artistic experience. There is appropriate training, artistic experience, and program design with the capacity to ensure quality instruction and/or meaningful artistic outcomes. | 5 points: The project will provide a consistently high-quality artistic experience. There is strong training, demonstrated artistic excellence, and intentional program design with the capacity to ensure rigorous, high-quality instruction and meaningful artistic growth. | |
| Qualifications of Key Personnel | 0 points: The applicant does not provide the names or qualifications of the key personnel involved in this project. | 1-2 points: The applicant has provided the names and minimal biographical summaries for key personnel involved in this project, but the list may be incomplete. Each individual's qualifications show little experience related to the project goals. | 3-4 points: The applicant has provided the names and biographical summaries for all key personnel involved in this project. Each individual's qualifications generally demonstrate experience related to project goals. | 5 points: The applicant has provided the names and thorough biographical summaries for all key personnel involved in this project. Each individual's qualifications clearly demonstrate substantial experience directly related to project goals. | |
| Budget | 0 points: The program budget is not balanced and/or an unrealistic estimate of project expenses and sources of income to support the project. | 1-2 points: The program budget vaguely demonstrates a balanced estimate of project expenses and sources of income to support the project. | 3-4 points: The program budget demonstrates a balanced and realistic estimate of project expenses and sources of income to support the project. | 5 points: The program budget clearly demonstrates a balanced and realistic estimate of project expenses and reliable sources of income to support the project. | |
| Partnerships | 0 points: The project represents no community partnerships between organizations, schools, and/or other entities to meet 3K-4K or K- 12 educational goals through the arts. | 1-2 point: The project represents unclear community partnerships between organizations, schools, and/or other entities to meet 3K-4K and/or K-12 educational goals through the arts. | 3-4 points: The project represents defined community partnerships between organizations, schools, and/or other entities to meet 3K-4K and/or K-12 educational goals through the arts. | 5 points: The project represents strong, defined community partnerships between organizations, schools, and/or other entities to meet 3K-4K and/or K-12 educational goals through the arts. | |
| Partnership Letter of Support | 0 points: No letters of support from community partners are present. | 1-2 point: Few Letters of support from community partners are present and represent a vague understanding of the role and scope of some partners involved. | 3-4 points: Letters of support from most community partners are present and represent understanding of the role and scope of the partners involved. | 5 points: Letters of support from all community partners are present and represent a clear understanding of the role and scope of all partners involved. | |
Populations Served – 5% of Total Score | |||||
| Populations Served | 0 points: Applicant does not demonstrate a clear and thorough understanding of the student population that will be served through this project. There is missing information, including which and how many students will benefit and any special characteristics or needs. | 1-2 points: Applicant demonstrates little understanding of the student population that will be served through this project. Includes incomplete information about which and how many students will benefit and any special characteristics or needs. | 3-4 points: Applicant demonstrates a general understanding of the student population that will be served through this project, including which and how many students will benefit and any special characteristics or needs. | 5 points: Applicant demonstrates a clear and thorough understanding of the student population that will be served through this project, including which and how many students will benefit and any special characteristics or needs. | |
Applications are accepted through our grants portal, which uses the Foundant platform.
New to Foundant? For frequently asked questions, registration instructions, and other helpful information, we highly recommend visiting the Grants Portal FAQ before you begin working in the system.
Applicants must have an active account in our grants portal (Foundant).
If you have previously used Submittable to apply for other SCAC grants or programs, please note that Foundant is a different system. Your Submittable credentials will not work; you will need a Foundant account to apply for this grant.
If you have used the grants portal as both an artist and for a school or organization, be sure you log on with the correct account to apply for this grant.
The SCAC recognizes that applicants may choose to use artificial intelligence (AI) tools as part of their grant preparation process. The following policy outlines acceptable and prohibited uses of AI in connection with grant applications and funded projects.
Applying for this grant indicates that you, the applicant, agree to the terms of this policy.
Applications go through a two-step review process.
The grants team reviews applications for completion and compliance with guidelines and application requirements. Incomplete or noncompliant applications will not move on to evaluation.
Grant reviewers evaluate complete applications based on the published review criteria. Reviewer comments are available to applicants upon request.
Award decisions are based on applicant scores and the availability of funds; award approvals are made by the SCAC Board of Commissioners. Award notifications are expected following the June 2026 board meeting.
If your application is funded, you (and/or your fiscal agent/receiver, if applicable) will enter into a contractual agreement with the South Carolina Arts Commission. All parties agree to comply with all applicable federal, state, and local laws, statutes, regulations, executive orders, provisions, and requirements stated in the contract.
You will receive notification and instructions when your contract is available in the grants portal. You must submit your completed contract packet, including signatures and other documentation as instructed, by the date indicated in the system. You must also complete all other assigned follow-ups by the due date.
Please note: Any significant revisions to grant-funded activities must be approved in writing, in advance, by the SCAC. Significant revisions to grant-funded activities must be emailed to grants@arts.sc.gov to be processed for approval or denial.
Additional details about managing an SCAC grant are available on our agency website.
Payments are reimbursement-based. This means any expenses must be financed up front by the grantee and/or a cooperating entity.
An accurate pay request, listing only expenses allowable under the program guidelines for the certified time period, must be submitted in order to receive payment for the grant award.
Grantees in this category are eligible for interim payments, with the final grant payment released upon receipt and approval of the grantee’s final report.
If you are using a fiscal agent/receiver, grant funds will be released to your fiscal receiver, who will then pay you.
ALL GRANTEES are required to submit a final report at the end of the grant period. The final report due date is stated in the grant contract. Failure to submit an accurate and complete final report by the due date will result in cancellation of the award and repayment of any funds received. SCAC will not fund applicants who have outstanding final reports.
Failure to file a complete Term Arts Education Project Final Report by the due date will result in a reduction of 15% to future grant awards.
A grant is considered delinquent if the grantee fails to complete any of the following tasks:
Upon identifying delinquency, the SCAC Grants Office will:
Extensions may be granted for emergencies (e.g., natural disasters, documented organizational crises) at the discretion of the SCAC Executive Director.

We also highly recommend a visit to our Grants Coaching webpage, for
Did you miss a group call or session? Look for the video link to access a recording of that presentation.