Purpose
To support arts education programs for Preschool (3K-4K) and/or K-12 students between school years, through both traditional and non-traditional providers
Who's Eligible
Most S.C. nonprofit organizations (arts & non-arts), colleges and universities, and units of government
Funding
Up to $15,000
Matching Requirement
1:2 (grantee:SCAC)
This grant supports quality arts education programs for preschool (3K-4K) and/or K-12 students between school years, through both traditional providers (arts organizations) and other organizations (e.g., social service, health, community, education) that utilize the arts to meet the educational, developmental, and social needs of preschool (3K-4K) and/or K-12 students. This grant supports projects occurring during the summer of 2026.
Activities should
Please Note
Grant guidelines are subject to change until the application opens.
In accordance with federal government policy, all organizations – including (but not limited to) private schools, public school districts, government entities, and nonprofit organizations – must provide a valid UEI number* to receive an SCAC grant award.
*Learn about the Unique Entity ID (UEI)
Note: If an applicant organization is using a fiscal agent/receiver, separate UEI numbers must be provided for both the applicant organization and the fiscal agent/receiver. Exceptions to separate UEI numbers are organizations run by a local government or a school district.
Please Note: Grant funds should supplement (add to) not supplant (replace) your current arts programming budget. Grant funds should allow for project funding that is BEYOND your current budget. Grant funds should NOT REPLACE your current budget so that it can be reallocated.
Examples of eligible activities include, but are not limited to:
For all grant-funded activities (including group lectures, demonstrations, performances, residencies, and short-term arts teaching experiences), the use of S.C. Arts Directory members is required for school and school district grantees and encouraged for grantees that are organizations.
Artists identified as Verified Teaching Artists on the S.C. Arts Directory have been additionally vetted by SCAC through the submission of sample lesson plans, recorded teaching samples, and letters of recommendation. For any grantee whose grant-funded activities are for K-12 student services, SCAC encourages the use of Verified Teaching Artists. Many school districts require the use of SCAC Verified Teaching Artists for classroom residencies. If working in a school environment, always check with both the individual school and the school district about policies related to hiring artists, arts organizations, and teaching artists.
No more than 10% of the total grant funds may be used for indirect costs (general overhead expenses not directly tied to the project). The remaining 90% must go toward direct costs, which are necessary to carry out the funded project.
This ensures that most of the funding directly benefits the project while allowing some flexibility for necessary overhead costs.
The primary contact listed in the grant application must be the main point of contact throughout the application process and, if awarded, during the grant period.
For organizations, the primary contact must be an employee or active volunteer of the organization applying for the grant. Intermediaries, such as hired consultants or external representatives, are not permitted to serve as the primary point of contact. The primary contact will be responsible for all communications with the SCAC, including responding to inquiries, providing updates, and submitting required documentation. Failure to adhere to this requirement may result in disqualification from the grant process or revocation of awarded funds.
This funding category is highly competitive.
SCAC Opportunity Initiative Counties:
See the “Grant Criteria” section of these guidelines for details.
December 18, 2025
Applications may be submitted until 11:59 p.m. (Eastern Time) on the deadline date. However, staff members are not available to assist you with questions or technical difficulties after SCAC closes at 5 p.m.
May 1–June 26, 2026*
* All projects must be implemented during the summer months of 2026 (May 1-June 26, 2026).
Up to $15,000
Expense reimbursement.
1:2 (grantee:SCAC)
Are you wondering what makes for a strong application?
The SCAC recommends using the rubric in this section as a guide when writing your application. Grant reviewers will score your application responses based on the criteria within this rubric.
FY26 Summer Arts Education Projects Grant Evaluation Rubric |
||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
Expanding Access to Arts Education – 60% of Total Score |
||||
| Community Need | 0-2 points: There is little to no demonstrated community need for the project or program. The program is not supported by relevant evidence or data. | 3-5 points: There is some demonstrated community need for the project or program. The program is supported by little evidence or data. | 6-8 points: There is appropriate demonstrated community need for the project or program supported by evidence and data. | 9-10 points: There is strong, clear demonstrated community need for the project or program supported by relevant evidence and data. |
| Educational Goals | 0-2 points: The educational goals of the project are unclear and do not include what students will learn academically, artistically, or otherwise. | 3-5 points: The educational goals of the project are vague but include some learning academically artistically, and otherwise. | 6-8 points: The educational goals of the project are stated and include quality learning academically, artistically, and otherwise. | 9-10 points: The educational goals of the project are clearly stated and include high-quality learning academically, artistically, and otherwise. |
| Activity Details and Responsibilities | 0 points: Activities are vague, unfeasible, or not clearly connected to project goals. Responsibilities are not identifed. | 1-2 points: Activites are limited with some feasibility and support of project goals. Responsibilities are only partially identified and assigned. | 3-4 points: Activites are clear, feasible and connected to the project goals. Responsibilities are identified and assigned. | 5 points: Activities are extremely clear and feasible with strong connection to the project goals. Respnsibilities are clearly identified and assigned. |
| Timeline and Milestones | 0 points: Timeline is unclear or missing major phases of project (planning, execution, or evaluation), does not identify milestones, and dates conflict significantly or do not align with project dates. | 1-2 points: Timeline partially outlines the project (planning, execution, and/or evaluation), identifies some milestones, and is mostly aligned with project dates. | 3-4 points: Timeline outlines all phases of the project (planning, execution, and evaluation), identifies key milestones, and is aligned with project dates. | 5 points: Timeline clearly and thoroughly outlines all phases of the project (planning, execution, and evaluation) and identifies key milestones. All dates are specific and fully aligned with project dates. |
| Student Engagement | 0-2 points: The activities do not engage students in the production of artworks or use of arts-based learning strategies. | 3-5 points: The activities somewhat engage students in the production of artworks or use of arts-based learning strategies. | 6-8 points: The activities appropriately engage students in the production of artworks or use of arts-based learning strategies. | 9-10 points: The activities directly engage students in the production of artworks or use of arts-based learning strategies. |
| Educational Standards | 0 points: Activities do not address South Carolina’s 2017 College and Career Ready Standards for Visual and Performing Arts Proficiency or the SC Profile of the Ready Kindergartener. | 1-2 points: Some activities address South Carolina’s 2017 College and Career Ready Standards for Visual and Performing Arts Proficiency and/or the SC Profile of the Ready Kindergartener in a reasonable way. | 3-4 points: Most activities address South Carolina’s 2017 College and Career Ready Standards for Visual and Performing Arts Proficiency and/or the SC Profile of the Ready Kindergartener in a meaningful and reasonable way. | 5 points: All activities address South Carolina’s 2017 College and Career Ready Standards for Visual and Performing Arts Proficiency and/or the SC Profile of the Ready Kindergartener in a clear, meaningful, and reasonable way. |
| Student Outcomes | 0-2 points: Evaluation plan does not include methods of measuring achievement of goals or student outcomes. | 3-5 points: Evaluation plan includes some methods of measuring achievement of goals and/or student outcomes. | 6-8 points: Evaluation plan includes defined methods of measuring achievement of goals and student outcomes. | 9-10 points: Evaluation plan includes clear and defined methods of measuring achievement of goals and student outcomes. |
| Project Growth | 0 points: The organization has not demonstrated growth or change within their grant project or program from previous years. | 1-2 points: The organization has demonstrated little growth and/or change to their grant funded project or program from previous years. | 3-4 points: The organization has demonstrated growth and/or change in their grant funded project or program from previous years. | 5 points: The organization has demonstrated significant growth and/or change in their grant funded project or program from previous years. |
Organizational Capacity – 30% of Total Score |
||||
| Organization and Mission | 0 points: The project or program is not within the scope of the organization’s mission. | 1-2 points: The project or program is somewhat within the scope of the organization’s mission. | 3-4 points: The project or program is within the scope of the organization’s mission. | 5 points: The project or program is clearly within the scope of the organization’s mission. |
| Commitment to Artistic Quality | 0 points: The organization does not demonstrate a commitment to artistic quality. | 1-2 points: The organization somewhat demonstrates a commitment to artistic quality and identifies measures to ensure that commitment is met. | 3-4 points: The organization demonstrates a commitment to artistic quality and identifies effective measures to ensure that commitment is met. | 5 points: The organization directly demonstrates a clear commitment to artistic quality and identifies effective measures to ensure that commitment is met. |
| Qualifications of Key Personnel | 0 points: Leadership and Key personnel are not qualified to deliver effective programming. | 1-2 points: Some leadership and key personnel are qualified to deliver effective programming. | 3-4 points: Most leadership and key personnel are qualified to deliver effective programming. | 5 points: All leadership and key personnel are highly qualified to deliver effective programming. |
| Budget | 0 points: The program budget is not balanced and/or an unrealistic estimate of project expenses and sources of income to support the project. | 1-2 points: The program budget somewhat demonstrates a balanced and realistic estimate of project expenses and sources of income to support the project. | 3-4 points: The program budget demonstrates a balanced and realistic estimate of project expenses and sources of income to support the project. | 5 points: The program budget clearly demonstrates a balanced and realistic estimate of project expenses and reliable sources of income to support the project. |
| Partnerships | 0 points: The project represents no community partnerships between organizations, schools, and/or other entities to meet 3k-4k or K-12 educational goals through the arts. | 1-2 points: The project represents unclear community partnerships between organizations, schools, and/or other entities to meet 3k-4k and/or K-12 educational goals through the arts. | 3-4 points: The project represents defined community partnerships between organizations, schools, and/or other entities to meet 3k-4k and/or K-12 educational goals through the arts. | 5 points: The project represents strong, defined community partnerships between organizations, schools, and/or other entities to meet 3k-4k and/or K-12 educational goals through the arts. |
| Partnership Letter of Support | 0 points: No letters of support from community partners are present. | 1-2 points: Letters of support from some community partners are present and represent some understanding of the role and scope of some partners involved. | 3-4 points: Letters of support from most community partners are present and represent understanding of the role and scope of the partners involved. | 5 points: Letters of support from all community partners are present and represent a clear understanding of the role and scope of all partners involved. |
Populations Served – 10% of Total Score |
||||
| Populations Served | 0 points: There is no clear understanding of the student population that will be served through this project. Missing information including which and how many students will benefit and any special characteristics or needs. | 1-2 points: There is little understanding of the student population that will be served through this project. Includes incomplete information about which and how many students will benefit and any special characteristics or needs. | 3-4 points: There is an understanding of the student population that will be served through this project, including which and how many students will benefit and any special characteristics or needs. | 5 points: There is a clear and thorough understanding of the student population that will be served through this project, including which and how many students will benefit and any special characteristics or needs. |
| Distinct Group Populations | 0 points: There is no connection between the selected group populations served and the details and reasoning behind how and why these groups were selected. | 1-2 points: There is little connection between the selected group populations served and the details and reasoning behind how and why these groups were selected. | 3-4 points: There is reasonable connection between the selected group populations served and the details and reasoning behind how and why these groups were selected. | 5 points: There is clear and reasonable connection between the selected group populations served and the details and reasoning behind how and why these groups were selected. |
Applications are accepted through our grants portal, which uses Foundant.
New to Foundant? For frequently asked questions, registration instructions, and other helpful information, we highly recommend visiting the Grants Portal FAQ before you begin working in the system.
Applicants must have an active account in our grants portal (Foundant).
If you have previously used Submittable to apply for other SCAC grants or programs, please note that Foundant is a different system. Your Submittable credentials will not work; you will need a Foundant account to apply for this grant.
If you have used the grants portal as both an artist and for a school or organization, be sure you log on with the correct account to apply for this grant.
Not quite ready to apply? You can preview the application before you create an account or start an application.
Applications go through a two-step review process.
The grants team reviews applications for completion and compliance with guidelines and application requirements. Incomplete or noncompliant applications will not move on to evaluation.
Grant reviewers evaluate complete applications based on the published review criteria. Reviewer comments are available to applicants upon request.
Award decisions are based on applicant scores and the availability of funds; award approvals are made by the SCAC Board of Commissioners. Award notifications are expected after the February 2026 board meeting.
If your application is funded, you (and/or your fiscal agent/receiver, if applicable) will enter into a contractual agreement with the South Carolina Arts Commission. All parties agree to comply with all applicable federal, state, and local laws, statutes, regulations, executive orders, provisions, and requirements stated in the contract.
You will receive notification and instructions when your contract is available in the grants portal. You must submit your completed contract packet, including signatures and other documentation as instructed, by the date indicated in the system. You must also complete all other assigned follow-ups by the due date.
Please note: Any significant revisions to grant-funded activities must be approved in writing, in advance, by the SCAC. Significant revisions to grant-funded activities must be emailed to grants@arts.sc.gov to be processed for approval or denial.
Additional details about managing an SCAC grant are available on our agency website.
Payments are reimbursement-based. This means any expenses must be financed up front by the grantee and/or a cooperating entity.
If you are using a fiscal agent/receiver, grant funds will be released to your fiscal receiver, who will then pay you.
ALL GRANTEES are required to submit a final report at the end of the grant period. The final report due date is stated in the grant contract. Failure to submit an accurate and complete final report by the due date will result in cancellation of the award and repayment of any funds received. SCAC will not fund applicants who have outstanding final reports.
In addition, failure to file a complete Summer Arts Education Project Final Report by the due date will result in a reduction of 15% to future grant awards.
A grant is considered delinquent if the grantee fails to complete any of the following tasks:
Upon identifying delinquency, the SCAC Grants Office will:
Extensions may be granted for emergencies (e.g., natural disasters, documented organizational crises) at the discretion of the SCAC Executive Director.
I’m Here to Help!We also highly recommend a visit to our Grants Coaching webpage, for
Did you miss a group call or session? Look for the video link to access a recording of that presentation.