Purpose
To help schools acquire supplies, materials, equipment, professional development, or creative arts therapy services.
Who's Eligible
4K CERDEP classrooms/providers, most public, private, and charter schools in S.C.
Funding
Up to $2,500 per grant request
Matching Requirement
Varies by provider type
To help schools acquire the supplies, materials, equipment, professional development, or creative arts therapy services needed to address student outcomes through innovative arts practices and/or curriculum, arts-enhanced curriculum, or arts-integrated curriculum.
The Kennedy Center writes: “The arts find their way into elementary, middle, and high school classrooms every day in a variety of ways. The variations can be distilled into three main categories:
All three variations are important, needed, and valid.”
To read more about the way these variations are defined, please visit their website and read “What is Arts Integration?”
The School Arts Support Grant is intended to support educators pursuing any of the three variations to increase student engagement in their classrooms.
Please Note
Grant guidelines are subject to change until the application opens.
Coaching videos are provided as a guide for applicants in the stated fiscal year and information provided might not apply to subsequent years.
The applicant must be:
Non-CERDEP public, private, and corporate preschools/providers are ineligible to apply. Please contact us before applying if:
In accordance with federal government policy, all organizations – including (but not limited to) private schools, public school districts, government entities, and nonprofit organizations – must provide a valid UEI number* to receive an SCAC grant award.
*Learn about the Unique Entity ID (UEI)
Note: If an applicant organization is using a fiscal agent/receiver, separate UEI numbers must be provided for both the applicant organization and the fiscal agent/receiver. Exceptions to separate UEI numbers are organizations run by a local government or a school district.
Individual public schools may use their school district’s Unique Entity ID and do not need to register separately.
Grant funds should supplement, not replace, your current arts budget—meaning that grant funds should pay for materials/projects that are beyond your current budget capacity. Grant funds should not pay for materials/projects so that your current arts budget can be used elsewhere.
May use grant funds to pay for:
May use grant funds to pay for:
SAS grant funds cannot be used for:
For all grant-funded activities (including group lectures, demonstrations, performances, residencies, and short-term arts teaching experiences), the use of S.C. Arts Directory members is required for school and school district grantees and encouraged for grantees that are organizations.
Artists identified as Verified Teaching Artists on the S.C. Arts Directory have been additionally vetted by SCAC through the submission of sample lesson plans, recorded teaching samples, and letters of recommendation. For any grantee whose grant-funded activities are for K-12 student services, SCAC encourages the use of Verified Teaching Artists. Many school districts require the use of SCAC Verified Teaching Artists for classroom residencies. If working in a school environment, always check with both the individual school and the school district about policies related to hiring artists, arts organizations, and teaching artists.
To capture the impact of the arts on student learning, you will be required to implement an evaluation plan to measure the effect of your grant-funded materials/projects on student outcomes. Below are suggested examples of ways to measure impact and collect data throughout the grant period. Evaluation methods are not limited to these examples.
Examples of possible school-level evaluation activities:
The primary contact listed in the grant application must be the main point of contact throughout the application process and, if awarded, during the grant period.
For organizations, the primary contact must be an employee or active volunteer of the organization applying for the grant. Intermediaries, such as hired consultants or external representatives, are not permitted to serve as the primary point of contact. The primary contact will be responsible for all communications with the SCAC, including responding to inquiries, providing updates, and submitting required documentation. Failure to adhere to this requirement may result in disqualification from the grant process or revocation of awarded funds.
Priority may be given to:
Application period: July 21, 2025 – February 17, 2026.
Applications must be submitted at least five (5) weeks before grant-funded activities begin or purchases are made. However, earlier applications are encouraged. Applicants do not need to wait until five weeks before their project starts to apply. Projects can begin as early as Aug. 18, 2025.
Applications may be submitted until 11:59 p.m. (Eastern Time) on the deadline date. However, staff members are not available to assist you with questions or technical difficulties after SCAC closes at 5 p.m.
All grant-supported activities must be implemented between August 18, 2025 and May 15, 2026.
Up to $2,500 per grant.
Federal funding note: This grant might be funded using federal dollars. The SCAC will notify the grantee if federal dollars are used. In the event federal dollars are used, the grantee’s match must not consist of federal funding.
1:3 (grantee:SCAC)*
A 1:3 match means that for each dollar granted, the grantee must match with $0.33 of their own funds.
*Exception: No match is required for 4K providers located in SCAC Opportunity Counties (listed in the “Priority” section of these guidelines).
1:2 (grantee:SCAC)*
*Exception: No match is required for schools on this S.C. Department of Education list of schools with low-income student populations above 70%.
Are you wondering what makes for a strong application?
The SCAC recommends using the rubrics in this section as a guide when writing your application. Grant panelists will score your application responses based on the criteria within these rubrics.
FY26 SAS 4K Grant Application Evaluation Rubric |
||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| This rubric, by intent, does not total 100 points. | ||||
Materials/Activities/Professional Learning – 46% of Total Score |
||||
| Grant Funding Purpose | 0-3 points: The applicant does not identify or detail relevant professional learning, activities, and/or materials. | 4-6 points: The applicant identifies and details somewhat relevant professional learning, activities, and/or materials. | 7-8 points: The applicant identifies and details relevant professional learning, activities, and/or materials. | 9-10 points: The applicant identifies and details clearly relevant professional learning, activities, and/or materials. |
| Classroom Arts Integration | 0-4 points: The applicant does not explain how the professional learning, activities, and/or materials will be used to integrate the arts into the classroom. | 5-9 points: The applicant somewhat explains how the professional learning, activities, and/or materials will be used to integrate the arts into the classroom. | 10-12 points: The applicant clearly explains how the professional learning, activities, and/or materials will be used to integrate the arts into the classroom. | 13-15 points: The applicant meaningfully explains how the professional learning, activities, and/or materials will be used to integrate the arts into the classroom. |
| Student Impact | 0-1 points: The applicant is unclear on how many students will be impacted by this grant. | 2-3 points: The applicant has a vague sense of how many students will be impacted by this grant. | 4 points: The applicant has a realistic sense of how many students will be impacted by this grant. | 5 points: The applicant has a clear and realistic sense of how many students will be impacted by this grant. |
Addressing Student Needs – 39% of Total Score |
||||
| Profile of the Ready Kindergartner | 0-3 points: The applicant did not explain how grant-funded activities, purchases, or professional learning, address the indicators in the SC Profile of the Ready Kindergartner. | 4-6 points: The applicant somewhat explains how grant-funded activities or purchases, along with professional learning, address the indicators in the SC Profile of the Ready Kindergartner. | 7-8 points: The applicant explains how grant- funded activities or purchases, along with professional learning, address the indicators in the SC Profile of the Ready Kindergartner. | 9-10 points: The applicant compellingly explains how grant-funded activities or purchases, along with professional learning, address the indicators in the SC Profile of the Ready Kindergartner. |
| Evaluation | 0-4 points: The applicant has not identified one area of the Profile of the Ready Kindergartener and/or does not have a plan to evaluate the impact of materials, activities, and professional learning on student outcomes. | 5-9 points: The applicant identified one area of the Profile of the Ready Kindergartener and has a vague plan to evaluate the impact of materials, activities, and professional learning on student outcomes. | 10-12 points: The applicant identified one area of the Profile of the Ready Kindergartener and has a clear plan to evaluate the impact of materials, activities, and professional learning on student outcomes. | 13-15 points: The applicant identified one area of the Profile of the Ready Kindergartener and has a compelling plan to evaluate the impact of materials, activities, and professional learning on student outcomes. |
Budget – 15% of Total Score |
||||
| Budget Details | 0-1 points: The applicant’s budget is not detailed and shows inadequate financial resources to complete the proposed activities. | 2-3 points: The applicant’s budget is somewhat detailed but has unrelated expenses or limited financial resources to complete the proposed activities. | 4 points: The applicant’s budget is detailed and has adequate financial resources to complete the proposed activities. | 5 points: The applicant’s budget is very detailed and shows strong financial resources to complete the proposed activities. |
| Supporting Budget Documents | 0-1 points: The applicant does not provide support budget documents. | 2-3 points: The applicant provides supporting budget documents that are not aligned with the items in their budget spreadsheet. | 4 points: The applicant provides support budget documents for all grant expenses in their budget spreadsheet. | 5 points: The applicant provides clear supporting budget documents for each of their planned grant expenses as outlined in their grant budget spreadsheet. |
Printer-friendly 4K providers rubric.
FY26 SAS K-12 Grant Application Evaluation Rubric |
||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
Student Outcomes and Approach – 61% of Total Score |
||||
| Student Outcomes | 0-1 points: The applicant has not identified the student outcome(s) they are aiming to address through this grant funding. | 2-3 points: The applicant has somewhat identified the student outcome(s) they are aiming to address through this grant funding. | 4 points: The applicant has identified the student outcome(s) they are aiming to address through this grant funding. | 5 points: The applicant has, in detail, identified the student outcome(s) they are aiming to address through this grant funding. |
| Arts Curriculum Approach Reasoning | 0-3 points: The applicant does not explain or connect their selected arts curriculum approach to the student outcomes identified. | 4-6 points: The applicant explains and somewhat connects their selected arts curriculum approach to the student outcomes identified. | 7-8 points: The applicant explains and clearly connects their selected arts curriculum approach to the student outcomes identified. | 9-10 points: The applicant explains and meaningfully connects their selected arts curriculum approach to the student outcomes identified. |
| Grant Expenses | 0-3 points: The applicant does not identify what they are planning to purchase using the grant funds. | 4-6 points: The applicant somewhat identifies what they are planning to purchase using the grant funds. | 7-8 points: The applicant identifies what they are planning to purchase using the grant funds. | 9-10 points: The applicant identifies in detail what they are planning to purchase using the grant funds. |
| Classroom Implementation | 0-4 points: The applicant does not offer a clear plan for how they will utilize the grant funded materials or implement practices from grant funded professional development during the grant period. A timeline of planned activities is missing or is not feasible. | 5-9 points: The applicant offers a vague plan for how they will utilize the grant funded materials or implement practices from grant funded professional development during the grant period. They have provided a timeline of planned activities that is somewhat feasible. | 10-12 points: The applicant offers a clear plan for how they will utilize the grant funded materials or implement practices from grant funded professional development during the grant period. They have provided a feasible timeline of planned activities. | 13-15 points: The applicant offers a detailed and well-organized plan for how they will utilize the grant funded materials or implement practices from grant funded professional development during the grant period. They have provided a very feasible timeline of planned activities. |
| Impact on Student Outcomes | 0-4 points: The applicant does not explain how grant purchases and activities will impact the stated student outcome(s). | 5-9 points: The applicant somewhat explains how grant purchases and activities will impact the stated student outcome(s). However, the explanation lacks specificity or clear evidence. | 10-12 points: The applicant explains how grant purchases and activities will impact the stated student outcome(s). | 13-15 points: The applicant explains in detail how grant purchases and activities will meaningfully impact the stated student outcome(s). |
Project Evaluation – 28% of Total Score |
||||
| Evaluation | 0-6 points: The applicant does not provide a clear plan for measuring the impact of grant-funded purchases or activities on the stated student outcome(s). Methods for evaluating effectiveness are missing or insufficiently described. | 7-12 points: The applicant provides a basic plan for measuring the impact of grant-funded purchases or activities on the stated student outcome(s). Some methods are mentioned, but the approach lacks clarity and/or specificity. | 13-17 points: The applicant provides a clear plan for measuring the impact of grant-funded purchases or activities on the stated student outcome(s). Data collection methods are appropriate and feasible. | 18-20 points: The applicant provides a comprehensive and well-structured plan for measuring the impact of grant-funded purchases or activities on the stated student outcome(s). Methods are appropriate and strongly align with the stated student outcome(s), demonstrating a thoughtful approach to measuring effectiveness. |
| Number of Students Impacted | 0-1 points: The applicant does not state how many students will be impacted by this grant. | 2-3 points: The applicant states how many students will be impacted by this grant but does not provide how they arrived at this figure. | 4 points: The applicant states how many students will be impacted by this grant and provides an explanation of how they arrived at this figure. | 5 points: The applicant states how many students will be impacted by this grant and provides a detailed explanation of how they arrived at this figure. |
Project Budget – 11% of Total Score |
||||
| Budget Details | 0-1 points: The applicant’s budget is not detailed and shows inadequate financial resources to complete the proposed activities. | 2-3 points: The applicant’s budget is somewhat detailed but has unrelated expenses or limited financial resources to complete the proposed activities. | 4 points: The applicant’s budget is detailed and has adequate financial resources to complete the proposed activities. | 5 points: The applicant’s budget is very detailed and shows strong financial resources to complete the proposed activities. |
| Supporting Budget Documents | 0-1 points: The applicant does not provide support budget documents. | 2-3 points: The applicant provides supporting budget documents that are not aligned with the items in their budget spreadsheet. | 4 points: The applicant provides support budget documents for all grant expenses in their budget spreadsheet. | 5 points: The applicant provides clear supporting budget documents for each of their planned grant expenses as outlined in their grant budget spreadsheet. |
Applications are accepted through our grants portal, which uses the Foundant platform.
New to Foundant? For frequently asked questions, registration instructions, and other helpful information, we highly recommend visiting the Grants Portal FAQ before you begin working in the system.
Applicants must have an active account in our grants portal (Foundant).
If you have previously used Submittable to apply for other SCAC grants or programs, please note that Foundant is a different system. Your Submittable credentials will not work; you will need a Foundant account to apply for this grant.
If you have used the grants portal as both an artist and for a school or organization, be sure you log on with the correct account to apply for this grant.
Helpful Hint: The primary contact person for this grant should be the arts teacher who will administer the grant activities. To ensure the correct person is listed as the primary contact for your application, that person should be the one to log on and click the “Apply” button to start the application. The primary contact person for this grant should be the person who will:
All School Arts Support grant applications are required to include a letter of support from the school’s principal or center director.
Not quite ready to apply? You can preview the application before you create an account or start an application.
The Grants Team will review submitted applications for completeness and compliance with guideline and application requirements. SCAC program staff and management will evaluate the applications based on the published review criteria and priority areas. An applicant’s panel comments are available to them upon request. Staff will develop funding recommendations, based on these evaluations and the availability of funds. Final funding decisions are approved by the deputy director. Award notification is expected in four (4) to five (5) weeks of submission.
If your application is funded, you (and/or your fiscal agent/receiver, if applicable) will enter into a contractual agreement with the South Carolina Arts Commission. All parties agree to comply with all applicable federal, state, and local laws, statutes, regulations, executive orders, provisions, and requirements stated in the contract.
You will receive notification and instructions when your contract is available in the grants portal. You must submit your completed contract packet, including signatures and other documentation as instructed, by the date indicated in the system. You must also complete all other assigned follow-ups by the due date.
Please note: Any significant revisions to grant-funded activities must be approved in writing, in advance, by the SCAC. Significant revisions to grant-funded activities must be emailed to grants@arts.sc.gov to be processed for approval or denial.
Additional details about managing an SCAC grant are available on our agency website.
This grant operates on a reimbursement basis, meaning grantees must pay for approved expenses upfront. Reimbursements are only for approved expenses incurred within the grant period.
A final report is required to close out this grant. The grantee will not receive payment until the final report is submitted and approved.
ALL GRANTEES are required to submit a final report at the end of the grant period. The final report due date is stated in the grant contract. Failure to submit an accurate and complete final report by the due date will result in cancellation of the award and repayment of any funds received. SCAC will not fund applicants who have outstanding final reports.
A grant is considered delinquent if the grantee fails to complete any of the following tasks:
Upon identifying delinquency, the SCAC Grants Office will:
Extensions may be granted for emergencies (e.g., natural disasters, documented organizational crises) at the discretion of the SCAC Executive Director.
I’m Here to Help!
We also highly recommend a visit to our Grants Coaching webpage, for
Did you miss a group call or session? Look for the video link to access a recording of that presentation.