Purpose
For South Carolina Cultural Districts to expand and integrate creative placemaking endeavors outlined in their approved strategic plans.
Who's Eligible
Current S.C. Cultural Districts
Funding
Up to $10,000
Matching Requirement
1:2 (grantee:SCAC)
This grant supports a broad range of creative placemaking endeavors led by S.C. Cultural Districts, including—but not limited to—festivals, performances, workshops, and public art projects. All programming must be located within a Cultural District’s approved boundaries and align with its strategic plan.
Projects should:
Please Note
Grant guidelines are subject to change until the application opens.
In accordance with federal government policy, all organizations – including (but not limited to) private schools, public school districts, government entities, and nonprofit organizations – must provide a valid UEI number* to receive an SCAC grant award.
*Learn about the Unique Entity ID (UEI)
Note: If an applicant organization is using a fiscal agent/receiver, separate UEI numbers must be provided for both the applicant organization and the fiscal agent/receiver. Exceptions to separate UEI numbers are organizations run by a local government or a school district.
All grant applicants must ensure their applications, proposed projects, and any related materials comply with all applicable federal, state, and local laws. This includes SC Code § 16-15-305 (2024), which prohibits the dissemination of obscene materials.
Obscene content is strictly prohibited in grant applications and any proposed project activities. Applications that include materials or activities determined to be obscene will not be reviewed or considered for funding.
No component of an SCAC-funded project, including those funded with SCAC funds and those funded with matching funds, can fall into this category. Failure to comply with these regulations may result in the termination of funding and other legal consequences.
We strongly encourage all applicants to carefully review the full legal text of SC Code § 16-15-305 (2024), to ensure their proposals are in full compliance.
Each S.C. Cultural District may submit only one (1) application per cycle.
Grant funds must be used for actual project costs, defined as consumable and non-consumable items needed to complete the proposed project.
These include, but are not limited to:
For all grant-funded activities (including group lectures, demonstrations, performances, residencies, and short-term arts teaching experiences), the use of S.C. Arts Directory members is required for school and school district grantees and encouraged for grantees that are organizations.
Artists identified as Verified Teaching Artists on the S.C. Arts Directory have been additionally vetted by SCAC through the submission of sample lesson plans, recorded teaching samples, and letters of recommendation. For any grantee whose grant-funded activities are for K-12 student services, SCAC encourages the use of Verified Teaching Artists. Many school districts require the use of SCAC Verified Teaching Artists for classroom residencies. If working in a school environment, always check with both the individual school and the school district about policies related to hiring artists, arts organizations, and teaching artists.
These include, but are not limited to:
No more than 10% of the total grant funds may be used for indirect costs (general overhead expenses not directly tied to the project). The remaining 90% must go toward direct costs, which are necessary to carry out the funded project.
This ensures that most of the funding directly benefits the project while allowing some flexibility for necessary overhead costs.
The primary contact listed in the grant application must be the main point of contact throughout the application process and, if awarded, during the grant period.
For organizations, the primary contact must be an employee or active volunteer of the organization applying for the grant. Intermediaries, such as hired consultants or external representatives, are not permitted to serve as the primary point of contact. The primary contact will be responsible for all communications with the SCAC, including responding to inquiries, providing updates, and submitting required documentation. Failure to adhere to this requirement may result in disqualification from the grant process or revocation of awarded funds.
April 23, 2026
Applications may be submitted until 11:59 p.m. (Eastern Time) on the deadline date. However, staff members are not available to assist you with questions or technical difficulties after SCAC closes at 5 p.m.
August 1, 2026–May 31, 2027
Up to $10,000
Expense reimbursement.
1:2 (grantee:SCAC)
Are you wondering what makes for a strong application?
The SCAC recommends using the rubric in this section as a guide when writing your application. Grant reviewers will score your application responses based on the criteria within this rubric.
FY27 Cultural District Grant Application Evaluation Rubric |
||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
Project Details – 25% of Total Score |
||||
| Arts Integration | 0-2 points: Arts, culture, and/or design are not mentioned or are disconnected from the project. | 3-6 points: Arts, culture, and/or design are included, but integration appears supplementary or surface-level. | 7-10 points: Arts, culture, and/or design are clearly and intentionally integrated into the project. | 11-13 points: Arts, culture, and/or design are deeply woven throughout the project, demonstrating innovation. |
| Public Engagement | 0-2 points: Project does not involve the public or does not have clear strategies for community engagement or connection. | 3-5 points: Project uses arts-based activities to connect with the public passively or in non-participatory ways. | 6-9 points: Project intentionally engages the public, where community members contribute ideas and benefit directly through meaningful participation in the arts. | 10-12 points: Project embeds arts-based engagement as the core process for community and public engagement, fostering dialogue and deep relationships. |
Project Implementation – 25% of Total Score |
||||
| Key Administrative Personnel | 0-1 points: Administrative personnel bio(s) shows minimal or indirect experience related to the project area. Necessary leadership, relevant skills, or accomplishments that demonstrate readiness to manage the proposed project are limited or nonexistent. | 2-4 points: Administrative personnel bio(s) shows some relevant experience, training, or roles, but leadership and/or expertise appears unrelated to the proposed project. | 5-7 points: Administrative personnel bio(s) demonstrates clear, relevant experience and skills aligned with the proposed project. Bios reflect successful leadership or management in similar or related contexts. | 8-10 points: Administrative personnel bio(s) reflects significant and relevant expertise, with a strong record of leadership, innovation, and experience that positions them to lead the project with depth and vision. |
| Artistic Personnel | 0-1 points: Artistic personnel bio(s) shows minimal or no artistic experience. There is limited evidence of creative leadership, relevant artistic practice, or community engagement. | 2-3 points: Artistic personnel bio(s) shows an active artistic practice with some relevant public experience. They demonstrate growing artistic direction, but community experience may be narrow relative to project scope. | 4-6 points: Artistic personnel bio(s) demonstrates a strong artistic practice with relevant experience leading or contributing to creative projects. Bios reflect artistic excellence, and strong community engagement and collaboration experience. | 7-8 points: Artistic personnel bio(s) reflects deep artistic expertise and public leadership. They demonstrate an established record of innovation, artistic vision, and community engagement. |
| Non-Arts Partners | 0-1 points: Non-arts personnel bio(s) does not show involvement OR show minimal relevant experience or capacity to contribute effectively to the project. | 2-3 points: Non-arts personnel bio(s) reflects some relevant experience. They demonstrate growing professional skill, but scope of experience is limited relative to project needs. | 4-5 points: Non-arts personnel bio(s) demonstrates relevant experience and skills aligned with project needs. Effective collaboration and/or problem-solving in similar contexts are apparent. | 6-7 points: Non-arts personnel bio(s) reflects extensive and highly relevant expertise. There is demonstrated strong collaboration and strategic thinking. They are clearly positioned to support or advance the project with skill and reliability. |
Project Impact – 25% of Total Score |
||||
| Project Goals | 0-1 points: There are no goals or outcomes, or they are vague or irrelevant. The goals and outcomes are lofty considering the given timeframe. | 2-4 points: The goals and outcomes are general and lack specificity but are relevant and mostly achievable in the given timeframe. | 5-7 points: The majority of the project goals and outcomes are specific, relevant, and achievable given the proposed timeframe. | 8-10 points: Each project goal and outcome is specific, deliberate, and relevant. The time frame is highly realistic. |
| Strategic Plan | 0-1 points: Project goals show little to no connection to the Cultural District’s strategic plan. Alignment appears incidental or superficial, with minimal evidence of intentional planning. | 2-3 points: Project goals show some relevance to the strategic plan, but connections are partial or weak. Intentionality is limited or scattered across plan objectives. | 4-6 points: Project goals clearly reflect the priorities or action steps in the strategic plan. There is intentional planning, and explanation of how the project advances the strategic plan objectives is present. | 7-8 points: Project goals are deeply aligned with the strategic plan, demonstrating thoughtful, intentional alignment. The project advances multiple strategic priorities, reflects insight into long-term goals, and shows potential for meaningful impact on the district’s vision. |
| Success Measurements | 0-1 points: Methods for evaluation, reporting, and assessing public engagement are minimal or largely absent. There is no evidence that outcomes will inform future projects or community engagement. | 2-3 points: Methods for evaluation are described but are basic or provide surface-level information. The evidence of public engagement assessment is limited; connections to goals or public impact are vague. | 4-5 points: Methods for evaluation are clearly defined, relevant, and aligned with project goals. The approach demonstrates thoughtful measurement of outcomes and public engagement, with plans to report and use findings to inform future projects. | 6-7 points: Methods for evaluation are comprehensive, purposeful, and directly aligned with project goals. The approach demonstrates rigorous, strategic evaluation that captures meaningful outcomes and engagement, and includes mechanisms for reflection, adaptation, and long-term learning. |
Communications Plan – 5% of Total Score |
||||
| Communications Plan | 0 points: Description of marketing or distribution is missing or generic. There is no evidence that outreach is purposeful or tailored to target audiences. | 1-2 points: Marketing and distribution methods are described but are basic or general. Some thought has been given to purposeful public engagement. | 3-4 points: Marketing and distribution are clearly planned, relevant, and intentionally designed to reach and engage diverse target audiences. Plan shows thoughtful consideration of relevant communication channels. | 5 points: Marketing, distribution, and public awareness strategies are comprehensive, highly intentional, and deeply aligned with project goals. Plan demonstrates strategic, creative approaches that maximize audience engagement, reach, and impact a wide variety of community members. |
Budget – 15% of Total Score |
||||
| Project Budget | 1-4 points: The budget is not detailed and/or does not show adequate funding needed to complete the project. | 5-8 points: The budget lacks detail but shows adequate funding needed to complete the project. | 9-12 points: The budget is detailed and shows adequate funding needed to complete the project. | 13-15 points: The budget is clear and detailed and shows strong financial resources needed to complete the project. |
Support Materials – 5% of Total Score |
||||
| Support Materials | 0 points: Support materials are missing, outdated, or only tangentially related to the proposed project. Materials provide limited evidence of organizational or artistic capacity. | 1-2 points: Some support materials are relevant to the project and its arts components, but may not be current or in alignment with proposed project. Evidence of organizational capacity is emerging but not fully clear. | 3-4 points: Support materials are clearly relevant, current, and thoughtfully selected to demonstrate organizational and artistic ability to carry out the project. Work samples illustrate past projects and their alignment with the proposed project’s goals. | 5 points: Support materials are highly relevant, current, and comprehensive, clearly demonstrating organizational and artistic capacity. Work samples effectively illustrate the quality, depth, and intentionality of past projects and their alignment with the proposed project’s goals. |
Applications are accepted through our grants portal, which uses the Foundant platform.
New to Foundant? For frequently asked questions, registration instructions, and other helpful information, we highly recommend visiting the Grants Portal FAQ before you begin working in the system.
Applicants must have an active account in our grants portal (Foundant).
If you have previously used Submittable to apply for other SCAC grants or programs, please note that Foundant is a different system. Your Submittable credentials will not work; you will need a Foundant account to apply for this grant.
If you have used the grants portal as both an artist and for a school or organization, be sure you log on with the correct account to apply for this grant.
The SCAC recognizes that applicants may choose to use artificial intelligence (AI) tools as part of their grant preparation process. The following policy outlines acceptable and prohibited uses of AI in connection with grant applications and funded projects.
Applying for this grant indicates that you, the applicant, agree to the terms of this policy.
Support materials are a required part of your application. Support materials show you have the necessary skills, resources, and capacity needed to complete the proposed project.
You must submit at least two (2) and up to five (5) support materials.
Support materials might include, but are not limited to:
For each support material, you must provide a description and explain its relationship to the project.
Support materials may be uploaded, or you may provide a link to the support materials. If providing a link, the support materials must be accessible without login credentials for that platform. Do not include websites or links for which a password is required (e.g., if you link to a Facebook video, make sure it’s a public link, as reviewers may not have a Facebook account)..
Work samples demonstrate a participating artist’s skill level and expertise relevant to the project. Work samples must have been created within the last five (5) years (after Jan. 1, 2021).
You may submit up to five (5) work samples, in addition to the required support materials.
Work samples might include, but are not limited to:
For each work sample you must provide:
To submit work samples, you must provide a URL/link where the work sample can be viewed. The work sample(s) must be accessible without login credentials for that platform. Do not include websites or links for which a password is required (e.g., If you link to a Facebook video, make sure it’s a public link, as reviewers may not have a Facebook account). You may need to create new electronic files (documents, video files, etc.) that meet the length, content, and formatting requirements.
If you are uncertain about what to submit, please contact us.
Applications go through a two-step review process.
The grants team reviews applications for completion and compliance with guidelines and application requirements. Incomplete or noncompliant applications will not move on to evaluation.
Grant reviewers evaluate complete applications based on the published review criteria. Reviewer comments are available to applicants upon request.
Award decisions are based on applicant scores and the availability of funds; award approvals are made by the SCAC Board of Commissioners. Award notifications are expected following the June 2026 board meeting.
If your application is funded, you (and/or your fiscal agent/receiver, if applicable) will enter into a contractual agreement with the South Carolina Arts Commission. All parties agree to comply with all applicable federal, state, and local laws, statutes, regulations, executive orders, provisions, and requirements stated in the contract.
You will receive notification and instructions when your contract is available in the grants portal. You must submit your completed contract packet, including signatures and other documentation as instructed, by the date indicated in the system. You must also complete all other assigned follow-ups by the due date.
Please note: Any significant revisions to grant-funded activities must be approved in writing, in advance, by the SCAC. Significant revisions to grant-funded activities must be emailed to grants@arts.sc.gov to be processed for approval or denial.
Additional details about managing an SCAC grant are available on our agency website.
Payment will be on a reimbursement basis only and will be released upon receipt and approval of your final report.
ALL GRANTEES are required to submit a final report at the end of the grant period. The final report due date is stated in the grant contract. Failure to submit an accurate and complete final report by the due date will result in cancellation of the award and repayment of any funds received. SCAC will not fund applicants who have outstanding final reports.
A grant is considered delinquent if the grantee fails to complete any of the following tasks:
Upon identifying delinquency, the SCAC Grants Office will:
Extensions may be granted for emergencies (e.g., natural disasters, documented organizational crises) at the discretion of the SCAC Executive Director.

We also highly recommend a visit to our Grants Coaching webpage, for
Did you miss a group call or session? Look for the video link to access a recording of that presentation.