Purpose
To ensure that South Carolina's diverse living traditions remain vibrant and visible parts of community life.
Who's Eligible
Most S.C. nonprofit organizations, colleges & universities, and units of government
Funding
Up to $6,000
Matching Requirement
1:1 (grantee:SCAC)
Traditional arts are expressions of shared identity that are learned as a part of the cultural life of a particular group. This shared identity may be rooted in family, geographic, tribal, occupational, religious, or ethnic connections, among others. As expressions of a living culture, traditional arts have been handed down from one generation to the next and reflect the shared experience, aesthetics, and values of a group. Traditional arts are dynamic, reflecting change and individual innovation over generations of practitioners.
This grant ensures that South Carolina’s many living traditions remain vibrant, visible parts of community life by supporting nonprofit organizations and units of government seeking to promote and sustain the traditional arts practiced across the state. South Carolina’s cultural landscape encompasses diverse artistic traditions and practitioners, including indigenous, longstanding, and more recently-arrived art forms and communities.
Please Note
Grant guidelines are subject to change until the application opens.
Join the SCAC team for an informative applicant coaching session on Zoom.
A recording of the coaching session will be posted in this space afterward.
In accordance with federal government policy, all organizations – including (but not limited to) private schools, public school districts, government entities, and nonprofit organizations – must provide a valid UEI number* to receive an SCAC grant award.
*Learn about the Unique Entity ID (UEI)
Note: If an applicant organization is using a fiscal agent/receiver, separate UEI numbers must be provided for both the applicant organization and the fiscal agent/receiver. Exceptions to separate UEI numbers are organizations run by a local government or a school district.
All grant applicants must ensure their applications, proposed projects, and any related materials comply with all applicable federal, state, and local laws. This includes SC Code § 16-15-305 (2024), which prohibits the dissemination of obscene materials.
Obscene content is strictly prohibited in grant applications and any proposed project activities. Applications that include materials or activities determined to be obscene will not be reviewed or considered for funding.
No component of an SCAC-funded project, including those funded with SCAC funds and those funded with matching funds, can fall into this category. Failure to comply with these regulations may result in the termination of funding and other legal consequences.
We strongly encourage all applicants to carefully review the full legal text of SC Code § 16-15-305 (2024), to ensure their proposals are in full compliance.
These include, but are not limited to:
These include, but are not limited to:
The primary contact listed in the grant application must be the main point of contact throughout the application process and, if awarded, during the grant period.
For organizations, the primary contact must be an employee or active volunteer of the organization applying for the grant. Intermediaries, such as hired consultants or external representatives, are not permitted to serve as the primary point of contact. The primary contact will be responsible for all communications with the SCAC, including responding to inquiries, providing updates, and submitting required documentation. Failure to adhere to this requirement may result in disqualification from the grant process or revocation of awarded funds.
Priority will be given to:
Current SCAC Opportunity Initiative Counties:
April 23, 2026
Applications may be submitted until 11:59 p.m. (Eastern Time) on the deadline date. However, staff members are not available to assist you with questions or technical difficulties after SCAC closes at 5 p.m.
July 1, 2026–May 31, 2027
Up to $6,000
Federal funding note: This grant might be funded using federal dollars. The SCAC will notify the grantee if federal dollars are used. In the event federal dollars are used, the grantee’s match must not consist of federal funding.
Grantees may receive up to 80% of the total grant award prior to final report.
1:1 (grantee:SCAC)
Are you wondering what makes for a strong application?
The SCAC recommends using the rubric in this section as a guide when writing your application. Grant panelists will score your application responses based on the criteria within this rubric.
FY27 Folklife & Traditional Arts Project | |||||
Traditionality and Cultural Significance – 35% of total score | |||||
| Cultural Community | 0-2 points: The project does not represent a cultural community or group or uses inaccurate or overly generic language. | 3-5 points: The project references a cultural community and/or group, but the representation is overly broad or lacks clarity. | 6-8 points: The project represents a cultural community and/or group with clarity, understanding, and relevance. | 9-10 points: The project clearly and specifically represents a cultural community and/or group with strong understanding and clear relevance. | |
| Art Form Traditionality | 0-2 points: The art form represented in the project is not traditional or inaccurately addresses traditionality. | 3-5 points: The art form represented in the project references traditionality but is broad or unclear about its lineage, occupation, religious or ethnic connection, and/or another shared identity. | 6-8 points: The art form represented in the project is traditional through lineage, occupation, religious or ethnic connection, and/or another shared identity. | 9-10 points: The art form represented in the project is strongly traditional through direct lineage, occupation, religious or ethnic connection, and/or another shared identity. | |
| Practitioner Experience | 0-2 points: The artist(s) involved are not recognized by the cultural community as practitioners of the traditional art form. Biographical information is missing, unclear, or unrelated to the traditional art form. | 3-4 points: The artist(s) involved have limited recognition by the cultural community as practitioners of their traditional art form. Biographical information is only vaguely connected to the traditional art form. | 5-6 points: The artist(s) involved are recognized by the cultural community as practitioners of the traditional art form. Biographical information connects qualifications and experience to the traditional art form. | 7-8 points: The artist(s) involved are highly recognized by the cultural community as experienced practioners of the traditional art form. Biographical information is specific and relevant, and establishes recognition in the traditional art form. | |
| Cultural Significance | 0-1 points: The project's art form(s) does not have significance within the identified cultural community or is supported with minimal or unclear information. | 2-3 points: The project's art form(s) has slight significance within the identified cultural community, but is supported with vague, generalized, or weakly-connected information. | 4-5 points: The project's art form(s) is significant within the identified cultural community and is connected through relevant and accurate information, though lacking depth or context. | 6-7 points: The project's art form(s) is deeply significant within the identified cultural community with highly relevant information connected to cultural function and history. | |
Project Impact – 30% of total score | |||||
| Project Goals | 0-2 points: Project goals are not provided and/or do not include expected outcomes. | 3-5 points: Project goals are vague, somewhat align with the project, and are somewhat achievable. Expected outcomes are broad but align with corresponding goals. | 6-9 points: Project goals are outlined, align with the project, and are achievable. Expected outcomes are provided for and align with corresponding goals. | 10-12 points: Project goals are distinctly outlined, strongly align with the project, and are highly achievable. Expected outcomes are thoroughly detailed and strongly align with corresponding goals. | |
| Project Timeline | 0 points: The project timeline, activities/tasks, details, and location(s) are not present or do not align with its goals. | 1-2 points: The project timeline, activities/tasks, details, and location(s) are vaguely aligned with its goals. | 3-4 points: The project timeline, activities/tasks, details, and location(s) are aligned with its goals. | 5-6 points: The project timeline, activities/tasks, details, and location(s) are clearly aligned with its goals. | |
| Target Audience | 0 points: No target audience is identified and/or the audience is not aligned with the project goal(s). | 1-2 points: The target audience(s) is vaguely identified and loosely aligned with project goal(s). | 3-5 points: The target audience(s) is identified and connected to the project goal(s). | 6-7 points: The target audience(s) is clearly identified and directly connected to the project goal(s). | |
| Project Marketing | 0 points: No plan to market/distribute the project is provided. | 1-2 points: There is a vague plan to market/distribute the project to the target audience. | 3-4 points: There is a plan to market/distribute the project to the target audience. | 5 points: There is a detailed, well-structured plan to market/distribute the project to the target audience. | |
Project Management – 15% of total score | |||||
| Key Administrative Personnel | 0-1 points: Key personnel do not have relevant cultural expertise and/or knowledge of completing folk/traditional arts programming. | 2-3 points: Key personnel have limited cultural expertise and/or knowledge of completing folk/traditional arts programming. | 4-6 points: Key personnel have relevant cultural expertise and/or knowledge of completing folk/traditional arts programming. | 7-8 points: Key personnel have extensive, relevant cultural expertise and/or knowledge of completing folk/traditional arts programming. | |
| Success Measurements | 0-1 points: There is no plan to collect relevant data and/or success measurements do not reflect the project's goals. | 2-3 points: There is a vague plan to collect data to evaluate the project's goals. | 4-5 points: There is a plan to collect data to evaluate the project's goals, including audience metrics and expected outcomes. | 6-7 points: There is a detailed, well-structured plan to collect data to evaluate the project's goals, including audience metrics, expected outcomes, and future community need. | |
Budget – 10% of total score | |||||
| Budget Itemization | 0 points: The budget lacks detail and does not provide adequate/relevant financial resources to complete the project. | 1-2 points: The budget is somewhat detailed and itemizes some project-related expenses and income sources. | 3-4 points: The budget is detailed and itemizes project-related expenses and income sources. | 5 points: The budget is very detailed and completely itemizes all project-related expenses and income sources. | |
| Budget Resources | 0 points: The budget is not balanced and does not show estimates of project expenses and income sources. | 1-2 points: The budget is somewhat balanced and provides some realistic estimates of project expenses and income sources. | 3-4 points: The budget is balanced and provides realistic estimates of project expenses and income sources. | 5 points: The budget is completely balanced and provides strong estimates of project expenses and reliable income sources. | |
Work Samples – 10% of total score | |||||
| Work Sample Credits | 0-2 points: Work samples are not credited and/or work samples are not current (from 2020 or earlier). | 3-5 points: Work samples are properly credited (lists artist/organization that produced submitted samples) and are current (from 2021 to this year). | |||
| Work Samples | 0 points: Work samples are missing, unclear, or are poorly aligned with the featured traditional art form and/or proposed project. | 1-2 points: Work samples are loosely related to the featured traditional art form and/or only partially support the proposed project. | 3-4 points: Work samples represent and align with the featured traditional art form and will support the proposed project. | 5 points: Work samples are of high quality, clearly and effectively represent the featured traditional art form, and strongly support the proposed project. | |
Applications are accepted through our grants portal, which uses the Foundant platform.
New to Foundant? For frequently asked questions, registration instructions, and other helpful information, we highly recommend visiting the Grants Portal FAQ before you begin working in the system.
Please note:
Before applying for a Folklife & Traditional Arts Project Grant, you are strongly advised to discuss your project with the program director to determine if your project meets the guidelines.
Applicants must have an active account in our grants portal (Foundant).
If you have previously used Submittable to apply for other SCAC grants or programs, please note that Foundant is a different system. Your Submittable credentials will not work; you will need a Foundant account to apply for this grant.
If you have used the grants portal as both an artist and for a school or organization, be sure you log on with the correct account to apply for this grant.
The SCAC recognizes that applicants may choose to use artificial intelligence (AI) tools as part of their grant preparation process. The following policy outlines acceptable and prohibited uses of AI in connection with grant applications and funded projects.
Applying for this grant indicates that you, the applicant, agree to the terms of this policy.
Work samples are a required part of your application. Work samples should represent the artists and traditions featured in your project. Work samples help the reviewers assess the quality of your proposed program, its potential impact on the tradition(s) and community(ies) involved, and your organization’s capacity to complete the project. We encourage you to be selective when choosing your work samples. Work samples should:
We strongly encourage you to prepare your work samples before you visit the grants portal and begin your application.
You must submit at least two (2) and no more than five (5) work samples. Reviewers will review no more than 20 minutes of content per application.
To submit work samples, you must provide a URL/link where the work sample can be viewed. The work sample(s) must be accessible without login credentials for that platform. Do not include websites or links for which a password is required (e.g., if linking to a Facebook video, make sure it’s a public link, as reviewers may not have a Facebook account).
You may need to create new electronic files (documents, video files, etc.) that meet the length, content, and formatting requirements.
You must provide the following information for each work sample:
If you are uncertain what to submit, please contact us.
Support materials show you have the necessary skills, resources, and capacity needed to complete the proposed project. You may submit up to five (5) support materials. Be selective and deliberate when choosing your support materials. For each support material, you must provide a description and explain its relationship to the project.
Support materials may include, but are not limited to:
Support materials may be uploaded, or you may provide a link to the support material(s). If providing a link, the support materials must be accessible without login credentials for that platform. Do not include websites or links for which a password is required.
Applications go through a two-step review process.
The grants team reviews applications for completion and compliance with guidelines and application requirements. Incomplete or noncompliant applications will not move on to evaluation.
Grant reviewers evaluate complete applications based on the published review criteria. Reviewer comments are available to applicants upon request.
Award decisions are based on applicant scores and the availability of funds; award approvals are made by the SCAC Board of Commissioners. Award notifications are expected following the June 2026 board meeting.
If your application is funded, you (and/or your fiscal agent/receiver, if applicable) will enter into a contractual agreement with the South Carolina Arts Commission. All parties agree to comply with all applicable federal, state, and local laws, statutes, regulations, executive orders, provisions, and requirements stated in the contract.
You will receive notification and instructions when your contract is available in the grants portal. You must submit your completed contract packet, including signatures and other documentation as instructed, by the date indicated in the system. You must also complete all other assigned follow-ups by the due date.
Please note: Any significant revisions to grant-funded activities must be approved in writing, in advance, by the SCAC. Significant revisions to grant-funded activities must be emailed to grants@arts.sc.gov to be processed for approval or denial.
Additional details about managing an SCAC grant are available on our agency website.
Grantees may request interim payments of up to 80% of the total grant award. Any remaining amount of the grant award will be released upon receipt and approval of the final report.
ALL GRANTEES are required to submit a final report at the end of the grant period. The final report due date is stated in the grant contract. Failure to submit an accurate and complete final report by the due date will result in cancellation of the award and repayment of any funds received. SCAC will not fund applicants who have outstanding final reports.
A grant is considered delinquent if the grantee fails to complete any of the following tasks:
Upon identifying delinquency, the SCAC Grants Office will:
Extensions may be granted for emergencies (e.g., natural disasters, documented organizational crises) at the discretion of the SCAC Executive Director.

We also highly recommend a visit to our Grants Coaching webpage, for
Did you miss a group call or session? Look for the video link to access a recording of that presentation.