Purpose
To support school districts committed to implementing standards-based arts curricula and to making the arts an integral part of the basic curriculum and daily classroom instruction
Who's Eligible
Most S.C. school districts with a three-year arts education strategic plan and a part- or full-time district arts coordinator
Funding
Up to $25,000 per year for two (2) years
Matching Requirement
2:1 (grantee:SCAC)
This grant supports school districts committed to implementing standards-based arts curricula and making the arts an integral part of the basic curriculum and daily classroom instruction.
For this grant program,
Please Note
In accordance with federal government policy, all organizations – including (but not limited to) private schools, public school districts, government entities, and nonprofit organizations – must provide a valid UEI number* to receive an SCAC grant award.
*Learn about the Unique Entity ID (UEI)
Note: If an applicant organization is using a fiscal agent/receiver, separate UEI numbers must be provided for both the applicant organization and the fiscal agent/receiver. Exceptions to separate UEI numbers are organizations run by a local government or a school district.
Commissioners and staff of the S.C. Arts Commission and members of their immediate families are not eligible to apply for any individual SCAC programs, grants, fellowships, or services that provide financial support or career recognition.
All grant activities must be rooted in the district’s Arts Education Strategic Plan. Eligible expense categories for this grant are limited to the following:
No more than 10% of the total grant funds may be used for indirect costs (general overhead expenses not directly tied to the project). The remaining 90% must go toward direct costs, which are necessary to carry out the funded project.
This ensures that most of the funding directly benefits the project while allowing some flexibility for necessary overhead costs.
All grant activities that take place in schools (whether during the school day, summer, or after school) must be conducted by either:
Artists identified as Verified Teaching Artists on the S.C. Arts Directory have been additionally vetted by SCAC through the submission of sample lesson plans, recorded teaching samples, and letters of recommendation.
All grant applicants must ensure their applications, proposed projects, and any related materials comply with all applicable federal, state, and local laws. This includes SC Code § 16-15-305 (2024), which prohibits the dissemination of obscene materials.
Obscene content is strictly prohibited in grant applications and any proposed project activities. Applications that include materials or activities determined to be obscene will not be reviewed or considered for funding.
No component of an SCAC-funded project, including those funded with SCAC funds and those funded with matching funds, can fall into this category. Failure to comply with these regulations may result in the termination of funding and other legal consequences.
We strongly encourage all applicants to carefully review the full legal text of SC Code § 16-15-305 (2024) to ensure their proposals are in full compliance.
Priority will be given to school districts that meet the following criteria:
Special consideration will be given to individuals or organizations that are located in and/or have projects in SCAC’s Opportunity Initiative Counties:
Applicants located in or serving an Opportunity County will receive bonus points added to their final scores. Applicants outside of Opportunity Counties are neither penalized nor discouraged from applying in any way.
FY27 District Arts Support grantees and new applicants:
Applications may be submitted until 11:59 p.m. (Eastern Time) on the deadline date. However, staff members are not available to assist you with questions or technical difficulties after SCAC closes at 5 p.m.
July 1, 2027–May 1, 2028 and July 1, 2028–May 1, 2029
Grants are awarded on a two-year cycle of approval. Separate contracts will be issued each year.
Up to $25,000 per year
Expense reimbursement.
2:1 (grantee:SCAC)
Each $1 awarded must be matched with a $2 cash investment by the district towards the district arts budget. No in-kind expenses are allowed as part of the applicant’s match in this category.
The primary contact listed in the grant application must be the main point of contact throughout the application process and, if awarded, during the grant period.
For organizations, the primary contact must be an employee or active volunteer of the organization applying for the grant. Intermediaries, such as hired consultants or external representatives, are not permitted to serve as the primary point of contact. The primary contact will be responsible for all communications with the SCAC, including responding to inquiries, providing updates, and submitting required documentation. Failure to adhere to this requirement may result in disqualification from the grant process or revocation of awarded funds.
Are you wondering what makes for a strong application?
The SCAC recommends using the rubric in this section as a guide when writing your application. Grant panelists will score your application responses based on the criteria within this rubric.
FY28 District Arts Support Grant Application Evaluation Rubric |
||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
Capacity - Arts Budget – 14% of Total Score |
||||
| Balanced Budget | 0-1 points: The budget is not balanced and/or is not designated for arts programming. | 2-4 points: The budget is balanced but is minimally designated for arts programming. | 5-6 points: The budget is balanced and appropriately designated for arts programming. | 7-8 points: The budget is clear, balanced and appropriately designated for arts programming. |
| Budget - Support for the Arts | 0 points: The district’s arts budget does not demonstrate a capacity or commitment to supporting the growth of the arts in the district. | 1-2 points: The district’s arts budget somewhat demonstrates a current capacity and commitment to supporting the growth of the arts, and outlines the district’s plan for growth. | 3-4 points: The district’s arts budget demonstrates capacity and commitment to supporting the growth of the arts in the district. | 5-6 points: The district’s arts budget demonstrates capacity and strong commitment to supporting the growth of the arts in the district. |
Teachers – 6% of Total Score |
||||
| Qualified Teacher Rating | 0 points: No teaching staff have appropriate qualifications to teach the arts disciplines to which they are assigned. | 1-2 points: Few teaching staff have appropriate qualifications to teach the arts disciplines to which they are assigned. | 3-4 points: Most teaching staff have appropriate qualifications to teach the arts disciplines to which they are assigned. | 5-6 points: All teaching staff have appropriate qualifications to teach the arts disciplines to which they are assigned. |
Curriculum – 26% of Total Score |
||||
| Curriculum Guide | 0 points: There is no district-level curriculum guide for implementing state-approved achievement standards in the visual and performing arts. | 2 points: There is a district-level curriculum guide for implementing state-approved achievement standards in the visual and performing arts. | ||
| Lesson Plans | 0-1 points: Lesson plans and lesson plan reflections provide little to no evidence of thoughtful, quality classroom instruction. | 2-4 points: Lesson plans and lesson plan reflections somewhat show evidence of thoughtful, quality classroom instruction. | 5-7 points: Lesson plans and lesson plan reflections provide evidence of thoughtful, quality classroom instruction. | 8-10 points: Lesson plans and lesson plan reflections provide clear, strong evidence of thoughtful, quality classroom instruction. |
| Time Allotted to Arts Courses | 0-1 points: The district has allotted little to no time to arts courses throughout the district. | 2 points: The district has allotted some time to arts courses throughout the district. | 3-4 points: The district has allotted consistent time to arts courses throughout the district. | 5-6 points: The district has allotted consistent and substantial time to arts courses throughout the district. |
| Beyond School Day | 0-1 points: The district provides little to no arts programming (and does not plan to provide) beyond the school day throughout the district. | 2 points: The district provides some arts programming beyond the school day at a few schools throughout the district. | 3 points: The district provides strong arts programming beyond the school day at most schools throughout the district. | 4 points: The district provides a robust schedule of arts programming beyond the school day at all schools throughout the district. |
| Measuring Student Outcomes | 0-1 points: The district has little to no plan to measure the impact of arts learning on student outcomes according to the Profile of the SC Graduate. | 2 points: The district somewhat measures the impact of arts learning on outcomes according to the Profile of the SC Graduate. | 3 points: The district measures the impact of arts learning on student outcomes according to the Profile of the SC Graduate. | 4 points: The district deeply and thoroughly measures the impact of arts learning on student outcomes according to the Profile of the SC Graduate. |
Arts Strategic Plan – 26% of Total Score |
||||
| Strategic Plan Process | 0-1 points: The strategic planning process provides little to no space for input from stakeholders and is not communicated across the district. | 2 points: The strategic planning process provides some space for input from a variety of stakeholders and is minimally communicated across the district. | 3 points: The strategic planning process provides space for input from a variety of stakeholders and is communicated across the district. | 4-5 points: The strategic planning process provides ample space for input from a wide variety of stakeholders and is clearly and comprehensively communicated across the district. |
| Plan Content | 0-1 points: The district arts strategic plan is not up to date (extends through the entire two-year grant period), and/or is missing critical information such as: objectives, strategies, and parties accountable for the development and implementation of all activities. | 2-4 points: The district arts strategic plan is up to date (extends through the entire two-year grant period) but is missing critical information such as: objectives, strategies, and parties accountable for the development and implementation of all activities. | 5-7 points: The district arts strategic plan is up to date (extends through the entire two-year grant period), and includes some objectives, strategies, and parties accountable for the development and implementation of all activities. | 8-10 points: The district arts strategic plan is up to date (extends through the entire two-year grant period), and includes clear objectives, strategies, and parties accountable for the development and implementation of all activities. |
| Plan Evaluation | 0 points: There is little to no plan for regular evaluation of the effectiveness of the district arts strategic plan, and there is little to no evidence that lessons learned from the evaluation have informed and/or will inform adjustments to the plan. | 1-2 points: There is a plan for some evaluation of the effectiveness of the district arts strategic plan, and there is minimal evidence that lessons learned from the evaluation have informed and/or will inform adjustments to the plan. | 3-4 points: There is a plan for regular evaluation of the effectiveness of the district arts strategic plan, and there is evidence that lessons learned from the evaluation have informed and/or will inform adjustments to the plan. | 5-6 points: There is a plan for regular evaluation of the effectiveness of the district arts strategic plan, and there is strong, clear evidence that lessons learned from the evaluation have informed and/or will inform adjustments to the plan. |
| Letters of Support | 0-1 points: There is very little to no evidence of administrative and community support for the District Arts Support Grant Application. (Does not include letters from Superintendent, School Principal, Arts Teacher and Community Stakeholder.) | 2 points: There is some evidence of administrative and community support for the District Arts Support Grant Application. (Might not include letters from Superintendent, School Principal, Arts Teacher and Community Stakeholder.) | 3 points: There is evidence of administrative and community support for the District Arts Support Grant Application. (Includes letters from Superintendent, School Principal, Arts Teacher and Community Stakeholder.) | 4-5 points: There is strong evidence of administrative and community support for the District Arts Support Grant Application. (Includes letters from Superintendent, School Principal, Arts Teacher and Community Stakeholder.) |
District Policies – 28% of Total Score |
||||
| Arts Teacher Meetings | 0-2 points: There are little to no scheduled meetings among arts teachers. | 3-5 points: There are some scheduled meetings among arts teachers. | 6-7 points: There are regularly scheduled meetings among arts teachers. | 8-10 points: There are frequent, regularly scheduled meetings among arts teachers to collaborate. |
| Professional Arts Learning | 0-1 points: Arts teachers receive little to no relevant arts-specific professional learning opportunities. | 2-4 points: Arts teachers receive some relevant arts-specific professional learning opportunities. | 5-6 points: Arts teachers receive engaging and relevant arts-specific professional learning opportunities. | 7-8 points: Arts teachers receive frequent engaging and relevant arts-specific professional learning opportunities. |
| Professional Learning Impact | 0-2 points: Professional learning reflection videos provide little to no indication that district-level professional learning positively impacts student outcomes. | 3-5 points: Professional learning reflection videos somewhat indicate that district-level professional learning positively impacts student outcomes. | 6-7 points: Professional learning reflection videos indicate that district-level professional learning positively impacts student outcomes. | 8-10 points: Professional learning reflection videos clearly indicate that district-level professional learning positively impacts student outcomes. |
To apply for this grant, you must submit a Letter of Intent to Apply through the grants portal. Please upload your letter of intent on district letterhead.
Please include the following in your Letter of Intent to Apply:
If the program director determines that your intended proposal meets the guideline requirements, you will receive an invitation and instructions for starting your grant application. For questions about this process, please contact the program director.
Applications are accepted through our grants portal, Foundant.
New to Foundant? For frequently asked questions, registration instructions, and other helpful information, we highly recommend visiting the Grants Portal FAQ before you begin working in the system.
Applicants must have an active account in our grants portal (Foundant).
If you have previously used Submittable to apply for other SCAC grants or programs, please note that Foundant is a different system. Your Submittable credentials will not work; you will need a Foundant account to apply for this grant.
If you have used the grants portal as both an artist and for a school or organization, be sure you log on with the correct account to apply for this grant.
To demonstrate how visual and performing arts standards at the district level inform and permeate classroom instruction, please select three (3) teachers to share a lesson plan and reflection video.
Select two (2) professional development participants to submit brief videos reflecting on arts-based professional development that your district provides.
The SCAC recognizes that applicants may choose to use artificial intelligence (AI) tools as part of their grant preparation process. The following policy outlines acceptable and prohibited uses of AI in connection with grant applications and funded projects.
Applying for this grant indicates that you, the applicant, agree to the terms of this policy.
Based on review of the submitted letters of intent, selected applicants will be invited to develop their proposal into a full grant application. Only those invited to proceed to Part Two will be eligible for District Arts Support funding.
The grants team reviews submitted intent to apply applications for completeness and compliance with guidelines and application requirements. Incomplete or noncompliant intent to apply applications will not move on to evaluation.
Grant reviewers will evaluate the intent to apply based on the published review criteria and recommend applications to be invited to develop a full grant application.
The grants team reviews applications for completion and compliance with guidelines and application requirements. Incomplete or noncompliant applications will not move on to evaluation.
Grant reviewers evaluate complete applications based on the published review criteria. Reviewer comments are available to applicants upon request.
Award decisions are based on applicant scores and the availability of funds; award approvals are made by the SCAC Board of Commissioners. Award notifications are expected after the June 2027 board meeting, pending completion of the state budget process.
If your application is funded, you (and your fiscal agent, if applicable) will sign a contract with the South Carolina Arts Commission. By signing, all parties agree to follow applicable federal, state, and local laws and regulations as outlined in the contract.
You’ll receive an email with instructions when your contract is ready in the grants portal. Submit your completed contract—including all required signatures and documents—by the deadline shown in the system. Complete any other assigned follow-up items by their due dates as well.
Payment will be on a reimbursement basis only and will be released upon receipt and approval of your final report. This means any expenses must be financed up front by the grantee and/or a cooperating entity.
An accurate pay request, listing only expenses allowable under the program guidelines for the certified time period, must be submitted in order to receive payment for the grant award.
ALL GRANTEES are required to submit a final report at the end of the grant period. The final report due date is stated in the grant contract.
This grant is awarded on a two-year cycle, but grantees are required to file a final report at the end of each annual grant period. Submission of your annual final report for year one of the two-year cycle will allow us to assess long-term progress and generate the next year’s contract.
If you fail to meet the grant requirements, SCAC may take any combination of the following actions:
Before taking action, SCAC will make a good-faith effort to contact you to reach a resolution. See the “Delinquent Grantee Communication Policy” below.
A grant is considered delinquent if the grantee fails to complete any of the following tasks:
Upon identifying delinquency, the SCAC Grants Office will:
Extensions may be granted for emergencies (e.g., natural disasters, documented organizational crises) at the discretion of the SCAC Executive Director.
I’m Here to Help!
We also highly recommend a visit to our Grants Coaching webpage, for
Did you miss a group call or session? Look for the video link to access a recording of that presentation.