Purpose
To support arts-based projects that engage rural communities throughout South Carolina.
Who's Eligible
Most S.C. nonprofit organizations (arts & non-arts), colleges and universities, public libraries, and units of government.
Funding
Up to $5,000
Matching Requirement
Varies by county
This grant supports arts-based projects in rural South Carolina that use the arts to address issues and challenges in those communities. This grant can also support partnerships between libraries and artists or arts organizations and encourage communities to participate in artistic and cultural activities.
Grant-funded activities should:
All projects must:
Applicants may receive only one (1) Art of Community: Rural SC grant per fiscal year.
Please Note
In accordance with federal government policy, all organizations – including (but not limited to) private schools, public school districts, government entities, and nonprofit organizations – must provide a valid UEI number* to receive an SCAC grant award.
*Learn about the Unique Entity ID (UEI)
Note: If an applicant organization is using a fiscal agent/receiver, separate UEI numbers must be provided for both the applicant organization and the fiscal agent/receiver. Exceptions to separate UEI numbers are organizations run by a local government or a school district.
Grant funds must be used for actual project costs, defined as consumable and non-consumable items needed to complete the proposed project. Those might include, but are not limited to:
For all grant-funded activities (including group lectures, demonstrations, performances, residencies, and short-term arts teaching experiences), the use of S.C. Arts Directory members is required for school and school district grantees and encouraged for grantees that are organizations.
Artists identified as Verified Teaching Artists on the S.C. Arts Directory have been additionally vetted by SCAC through the submission of sample lesson plans, recorded teaching samples, and letters of recommendation. For any grantee whose grant-funded activities are for K-12 student services, SCAC encourages the use of Verified Teaching Artists. Many school districts require the use of SCAC Verified Teaching Artists for classroom residencies. If working in a school environment, always check with both the individual school and the school district about policies related to hiring artists, arts organizations, and teaching artists.
No more than 10% of the total grant funds may be used for indirect costs (general overhead expenses not directly tied to the project). The remaining 90% must go toward direct costs, which are necessary to carry out the funded project.
This ensures that most of the funding directly benefits the project while allowing some flexibility for necessary overhead costs.
All grant applicants must ensure their applications, proposed projects, and any related materials comply with all applicable federal, state, and local laws. This includes SC Code § 16-15-305 (2024), which prohibits the dissemination of obscene materials.
Obscene content is strictly prohibited in grant applications and any proposed project activities. Applications that include materials or activities determined to be obscene will not be reviewed or considered for funding.
No component of an SCAC-funded project, including those funded with SCAC funds and those funded with matching funds, can fall into this category. Failure to comply with these regulations may result in the termination of funding and other legal consequences.
We strongly encourage all applicants to carefully review the full legal text of SC Code § 16-15-305 (2024) to ensure their proposals are in full compliance.
Special consideration will be given to individuals or organizations that are located in and/or have projects in SCAC’s Opportunity Initiative Counties:
Applicants located in or serving an Opportunity County will receive bonus points added to their final scores. Applicants outside of Opportunity Counties are neither penalized nor discouraged from applying in any way.
Application period: August 25, 2026 – March 25, 2027.
Applications must be submitted at least five (5) weeks before grant-funded activities begin or purchases are made. Your project start date will be no sooner than 35 days after you submit your application.
Earlier applications are encouraged. You do not need to wait until five weeks before your project starts to apply. Projects can begin as early as Tuesday, September 29, 2026.
Applications may be submitted until 11:59 p.m. (Eastern Time) on the deadline date. However, staff members are not available to assist you with questions or technical difficulties after SCAC closes at 5 p.m.
All grant-supported activities must be implemented between September 29, 2026 and May 31, 2027.
Up to $5,000
Federal funding note:
This grant is funded using federal dollars. The SCAC will notify the grantee of the type of federal dollars used. Because the grant will be funded using federal dollars, the grantee’s match must not consist of federal funding.
Additionally, federal funding requires special actions and auditing treatment. If you are audited, please advise your auditors of these federal receipts. The National Endowment for the Arts (NEA) has established the following requirements for recipients of federal funds:
Note: If your rural community spans counties in multiple tiers, please contact us BEFORE beginning your application.
No match
Tier 1 counties:
1:3 (grantee:SCAC)
A 1:3 match means that for each dollar granted, the grantee must match with $0.33 of their own funds.
Tier 2 counties:
Up to 50% of the grantee’s match may be in-kind donation of materials and contracted services that are essential to the project.
1:2 (grantee:SCAC)
A 1:2 match means that for each dollar granted, the grantee must match with $0.50 of their own funds.
Tier 3 counties:
Up to 50% of the grantee’s match may be in-kind donation of materials and contracted services that are essential to the project.
The primary contact listed in the grant application must be the main point of contact throughout the application process and, if awarded, during the grant period.
For organizations, the primary contact must be an employee or active volunteer of the organization applying for the grant. Intermediaries, such as hired consultants or external representatives, are not permitted to serve as the primary point of contact. The primary contact will be responsible for all communications with the SCAC, including responding to inquiries, providing updates, and submitting required documentation. Failure to adhere to this requirement may result in disqualification from the grant process or revocation of awarded funds.
Are you wondering what makes for a strong application?
The SCAC recommends using the rubric in this section as a guide when writing your application. Grant panelists will score your application responses based on the criteria within this rubric.
FY27 Art of Community Grant Application Evaluation Rubric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Community Assets and Challenges – 12% of Score | |||||
| Community Assets | 0 points: The community’s biggest assets are not identified or detailed. | 1 point: The community’s biggest assets are somewhat identified, with little detail. | 2 points: The community’s biggest assets are clearly identified and detailed. | 3 points: The community’s biggest assets are thoroughly identified and strongly detailed. | |
| Community Challenges | 0 points: The community’s biggest challenges are not identified or detailed. | 1 point: The community’s challenges are somewhat identified. Details are sparse, but relevant. | 2 points: The community’s challenges are clearly identified and detailed. | 3 points: The community’s challenges are thoroughly identified and strongly detailed. | |
| Challenge(s) Addressed | 0 points: The applicant does not identify the specific challenge(s) the project will address. | 1-2 points: Applicant somewhat identifies the specific challenge(s) the project will address. | 3-4 points: The applicant clearly identifies the specific challenge(s) the project will address, and there is a general understanding of local impact. | 5-6 points: The applicant thoroughly identifies the specific challenge(s) the project will address, and demonstrates a strong understanding of local impact. | |
Use of Arts and Culture – 10 % of Total Score | |||||
| Use of Arts and Culture | 0-1 points: Arts and culture are minimal or not at all a component of the project. The applicant provides fewer than three (3) examples of art and culture strategically addressing the challenge(s). | 2-4 points: Arts and culture are somewhat important to the project. The applicant provides at least 3-4 examples of art and culture strategically addressing the challenge(s). The examples lack detail or specificity. | 5-7 points: Arts and culture are clearly important to the project. The applicant provides five (5) examples of art and culture strategically addressing the challenge(s). | 8-10 points: Arts and culture are an extremely crucial component of the project. The applicant provides five (5) or more strong examples of art and culture strategically addressing the challenge(s). | |
Project Details – 28% of Total Score | |||||
| Project Description | 0-1 points: The project is unclear, or it will not accomplish any specific goals. | 2-3 points: The project lacks detail or specificity. The goals of the project are general and possibly achievable. | 4-5 points: The project is clear and detailed. The goals of the project are clearly defined and achievable. | 6 points: The project is amply described and detailed. The goals of the project are strong, specific, and achievable. | |
| Project Activities | 0 points: The planned activities are unclear. They are irrelevant and do not align with the project goals. | 1-2 points: Planned activities are somewhat detailed. They are minimally aligned with/supportive of the project goals. | 3-4 points: Planned activities are clear and specified. They are mostly aligned with and in support of the project goals. | 5 points: Planned activities are thoroughly detailed and planned. Activities are all strongly aligned with and in support of the project goals. | |
| Activity Timeline | 0 points: There is no activity timeline, or the timeline is not feasible and does not accomplish the project's goals. | 1-2 points: There is a limited activity timeline that is somewhat feasible and accomplishes the project's goals. | 3-4 points: There is a clear activity timeline that is feasible and accomplishes the project's goals. | 5 points: There is a comprehensive activity timeline that is clearly feasible and accomplishes the project's goals. | |
| Steering Committee | 0-1 points: Steering committee members do not have the experience and expertise needed to carry out the project. The Steering Committee chair is not qualified to lead the project. | 2-3 points: Some steering committee members have some experience, expertise, and community connections needed to carry out the project. The Steering Committee chair is somewhat qualified to lead the project. | 4-5 points: Steering committee members have experience, expertise, and community connections needed to carry out the project. The Steering Committee chair is clearly qualified to lead the project. | 6 points: Steering committee members have extensive experience, expertise, and community connections needed to carry out the project. The Steering Committee chair is highly qualified to lead the project. | |
| Artistic Personnel | 0-1 points: Bio(s) and support material do not indicate that artistic personnel are qualified to implement the components of the project. | 2-3 points: Bio(s) and support material indicate that artistic personnel are somewhat qualified to implement the project. | 4-5 points: Bio(s) and support material indicate that artistic personnel are qualified to implement the project. | 6 points: Bio(s) and support material strongly indicate that artistic personnel are highly qualified to implement the project. | |
Importance and Engagement – 35% of Total Score | |||||
| Project Importance | 0-1 points: The applicant provides little to no explanation on the project's importance to the community or the applicant. | 2-4 points: The project is somewhat important to either the applicant or the community. The applicant provides some details, but they lack specificity to the project. | 5-7 points: The project is clearly important to the community, the applicant, or both. The applicant provides 2-3 details supporting the project's importance and impact. | 8-10 points: The project is vital to the betterment of the community, the applicant, or both. There are several strong details supporting the project's impact. | |
| Marketing | 0-2 points: The applicant has not specified the project's audience. There is no marketing plan OR the marketing plan will not reach the intended audience. | 3-5 points: The applicant has a general audience. The marketing plan is somewhat defined or not targeted toward a specific audience(s). | 6-8 points: The applicant has specified the project's audience. There is a clear and well-planned marketing plan that will target the intended audience(s). | 9-10 points: The applicant has clearly specified the project's audience. There is a thorough and well-planned marketing plan that will directly target the intended audience(s). | |
| Engagement | 0-2 points: There is no public engagement component. Members of the community or local government will not engage in the project. | 3-5 points: There is a public engagement component. However, it's a minor or limited aspect of the project. The local government has limited or no involvement. | 6-8 points: The public engagement component is strong and important to the project. The project will clearly engage the public and the local government. | 9-10 points: Public engagement is crucial to the project. There is a plan to engage the community in multiple ways. The local government will be involved and engaged throughout the planning process. | |
| Success Measurements | 0 points: The applicant does not have a plan to collect qualitative or quantitative data to measure the success of the project. There is no plan to use data to measure project impact. | 1-2 points: The applicant has a basic or limited plan to collect data. They have a plan to collect either qualitative or quantitative data, but not both. | 3-4 points: The applicant has a clear plan to collect both qualitative and quantitative data. The data collected will inform how they measure impact and success. | 5 points: The plans to collect qualitative and quantitative data are both very strong and well detailed. The plan demonstrates a clear plan for using that data to measure impact and success. | |
Budget and Support Materials – 15% of Total Score | |||||
| Budget | 0-2 points: The budget is not detailed and/or does not show adequate funding needed to complete the project. | 3-5 points: The budget lacks detail but shows adequate funding needed to complete the project. | 6-8 points: The budget is detailed and shows adequate funding needed to complete the project. | 9-10 points: The budget is clear and detailed and shows strong financial resources to complete the project. | |
| Support Materials | 0 points: Supplemental information does not showcase the community need, applicant experience, or artistic quality to carry out the project. | 1-2 points: Supplemental information somewhat showcases the community need, applicant experience, or artistic quality to carry out the project. | 3-4 points: Supplemental information effectively showcases the community need, applicant experience, or artistic quality to carry out the project. | 5 points: Supplemental information strongly and effectively showcases the community need, applicant experience, or artistic quality to carry out the project. | |
Applications are accepted through our grants portal, which uses Foundant.
New to Foundant? For frequently asked questions, registration instructions, and other helpful information, we highly recommend visiting the Grants Portal FAQ before you begin working in the system.
Applicants must have an active account in our grants portal (Foundant).
If you have previously used Submittable to apply for other SCAC grants or programs, please note that Foundant is a different system. Your Submittable credentials will not work; you will need a Foundant account to apply for this grant.
If you have used the grants portal as both an artist and for a school or organization, be sure you log on with the correct account to apply for this grant.
The SCAC recognizes that applicants may choose to use artificial intelligence (AI) tools as part of their grant preparation process. The following policy outlines acceptable and prohibited uses of AI in connection with grant applications and funded projects.
Applying for this grant indicates that you, the applicant, agree to the terms of this policy.
You must submit at least one (1), and may submit up to five (5), supplemental materials. Supplemental materials may consist of support materials, work samples, or both.
Support materials show you have the necessary skills, resources, and capacity needed to complete the proposed project.
Support materials might include, but are not limited to:
For each support material you must provide a description and explain its relationship to the project.
Support materials may be uploaded, or you may provide a link to the support material(s). If providing a link, the support materials must be accessible without login credentials for that platform. Do not include websites or links for which a password is required.
Work samples demonstrate a participating artist’s skill level and expertise relevant to the project. Work samples must have been completed within the last five (5) years (after Jan. 1, 2021).
Work samples might include, but are not limited to:
For each work sample you must provide:
To submit work samples, you must provide a URL/link where the work sample can be viewed. The work sample(s) must be accessible without login credentials, password, or account for that platform. Do not include websites or links for which a password is required.
Audio or video clips cannot exceed 20 minutes total per application.
You may need to create new electronic files (documents, video files, etc.) that meet the length, content, and formatting requirements.
If you are uncertain what to submit, please contact us.
Applications go through a two-step review process.
The grants team reviews applications for completion and compliance with guidelines and application requirements. Incomplete or noncompliant applications will not move on to evaluation.
Grant reviewers evaluate complete applications based on the published review criteria. Reviewer comments are available to applicants upon request.
Award decisions are based on applicant scores and the availability of funds; award approvals are made by the SCAC Board of Commissioners. Award notification is expected within four (4) to five (5) weeks of submission.
If your application is funded, you (and your fiscal agent, if applicable) will sign a contract with the South Carolina Arts Commission. By signing, all parties agree to follow applicable federal, state, and local laws and regulations as outlined in the contract.
You’ll receive an email with instructions when your contract is ready in the grants portal. Submit your completed contract—including all required signatures and documents—by the deadline shown in the system. Complete any other assigned follow-up items by their due dates as well.
ALL GRANTEES are required to submit a final report at the end of the grant period. The final report due date is stated in the grant contract.
If you fail to meet the grant requirements, SCAC may take any combination of the following actions:
Before taking action, SCAC will make a good-faith effort to contact you to reach a resolution. See the “Delinquent Grantee Communication Policy” below.
A grant is considered delinquent if the grantee fails to complete any of the following tasks:
Upon identifying delinquency, the SCAC Grants Office will:
Extensions may be granted for emergencies (e.g., natural disasters, documented organizational crises) at the discretion of the SCAC Executive Director.

We also highly recommend a visit to our Grants Coaching webpage, for
Did you miss a group call or session? Look for the video link to access a recording of that presentation.