|Search This Site >>
Skip to Main Page Content
Be Driven by the Arts
Why Arts Matter
Arts in Education
Local Arts Agencies
Dates & Events
Arts & the Economy
Long Range Plan
Work by SC Artists
For Vacationers/ Visitors
Services & Programs
The Arts and the Economy
- How can we afford to support the arts in hard economic times?
- Can you clarify why the Arts Commission's state allocation would go mostly toward salaries and operations?
- Why can't the private sector take over funding of the arts?
- Why do we need arts in education when so few kids will grow up to be professional artists?
How can we afford to support the arts in hard economic times?
It is when times are bad that every resource must be allocated carefully to get the best results with the smallest investment. The arts are a proven recovery asset that supports jobs, stimulates commerce, revitalizes communities, attracts tourists and provides other economic benefits.
- As of February 2011, the allocation for the Arts Commission is 0.04% (four one- hundredths of one percent) of the state budget. Eliminating that small public investment in the arts will not save enough to provide significant relief. However, elimination will threaten the state's capacity to provide
sustained, strategic leadership on issues like education, quality of life and our economy, all of which impact citizens statewide.
Read about some of what's already been accomplished >>
- The state's small public investment helps stimulate South Carolina's creative industries, which generate 3% of the state's total economy and account for 78,000 jobs.
- In 2010, South Carolina’s investment in the arts of a little more than $2.4 million helped to generate more than $91 million in local matching funds. That’s a great return on investment—almost 38 to 1.
It looks like the Arts Commission spent a larger percentage of its $2 million in state funds on salaries than on grants in FY2011.
That statement does not provide a true picture of our budget, because it leaves out two very important points:
- This statement ignores the presence of federal funds and other sources of income in the agency's budget. We allocate well over $1 million in federal and other funds to grants.
- The Arts Commission uses state funds for salaries and operations, which include program costs and other constituent services. It takes people to make grants and produce statewide programming.
As our state funds have been cut, we've had to use a larger percentage of them for basic operations, but we spend almost all federal funds and other funds on grants and programming. Almost all of the FTEs (staff positions) allocated to the agency are tied to state funds, so that's where salaries are paid.
Why can't the private sector take over funding of the arts?
Private donations already provide support for many local arts organizations and efforts. In fact, private giving is one way for Arts Commission grantees to leverage additional support from other sources. So why can't that private support just be increased to make up for the loss of government funds?
- Private support tends to stay local, and in many communities, there is no source of private support. This is especially true in many rural areas with little or no industry, as well as communities challenged by low incomes and high unemployment. In many parts of the state, publicly funded efforts are the only available resource for participation in the arts, and sometimes one of the few low- or no-cost options for family activities and community involvement.
- Private support does not have the same mandate for equitabilty and accountability that is mandatory for government funding. The Arts Commission is charged with making sure that the benefits of the arts reach all areas of the state, and that the public funds that support that mission are spent responsibly.
- A government agency working at the state level can accurately assess the state’s cultural needs and assets, then organize efforts to help the state achieve goals that are relevant to its priorities. There is no private equivalent to that kind of strategic planning and implementation.
Why do we need arts in education when so few kids will grow up to be professional artists?
The goals of arts education are not limited to training future artists any more than school sports programs exist solely to produce future professional athletes. In both cases, the benefits extend far beyond a possible career track.
- Both sports and the arts encourage discipline, teamwork, endurance, critical thinking, and leadership. The arts also help develop communication and social skills, creativity, cultural awareness, and innovative thinking.
- Both sports and the arts provide students with a chance to excel, which is especially valuable to a child who feels inept or out of place in other areas of study.
- Research shows that students involved in arts education perform better, have better attendance records, and have parents who are more engaged in the education process.